• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农药评估:在自家地盘上保护公众健康。

Pesticide assessment: Protecting public health on the home turf.

作者信息

Sears Meg, Walker C Robin, van der Jagt Richard Hc, Claman Paul

机构信息

Ecosears.

出版信息

Paediatr Child Health. 2006 Apr;11(4):229-34.

PMID:19030278
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2528613/
Abstract

Pesticide regulation is examined in the context of Health Canada's Pest Management Regulatory Agency's assessment of the chlorophenoxy herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) for turf. 2,4-D is the most common herbicide used to kill weeds in grass.The medical literature does not uniformly indicate harms from herbicides. However, the balance of epidemiological research suggests that 2,4-D can be persuasively linked to cancers, neurological impairment and reproductive problems. These may arise from 2,4-D itself, from breakdown products or dioxin contamination, or from a combination of chemicals.Regulators rely largely on toxicology, but experiments may not replicate exposures from 2,4-D application to lawns because environmental breakdown products (eg, 2,4-dichlorophenol) may not accumulate and selected herbicides are possibly less contaminated. Dioxins are bioaccumulative chemicals that may cause cancer, harm neurological development, impair reproduction, disrupt the endocrine system and alter immune function. No dioxin analyses were submitted to the Pest Management Regulatory Agency, and the principal contaminants of 2,4-D are not among the 17 congeners covered in pesticide regulation. Independent assessment of all dioxins is needed, in tissues and in the environment.The 2,4-D assessment does not approach standards for ethics, rigour or transparency in medical research. Canada needs a stronger regulator for pesticides. Potentially toxic chemicals should not be registered when more benign solutions exist, risks are not clearly quantifiable or potential risks outweigh benefits. Until landscaping pesticides are curtailed nationally, local bylaws and Quebec's Pesticide Code are prudent measures to protect public health. Physicians have a role in public education regarding pesticides.

摘要

本文在加拿大卫生部害虫管理监管局对用于草坪的氯苯氧基除草剂2,4-二氯苯氧基乙酸(2,4-D)的评估背景下,对农药监管进行了审视。2,4-D是用于杀灭草坪杂草的最常见除草剂。医学文献对于除草剂危害的表述并不一致。然而,流行病学研究的总体情况表明,2,4-D与癌症、神经损伤及生殖问题之间存在令人信服的关联。这些影响可能源于2,4-D本身、其分解产物或二噁英污染,或是多种化学物质共同作用的结果。监管机构很大程度上依赖毒理学,但实验可能无法重现2,4-D施用于草坪时的暴露情况,因为环境中的分解产物(如2,4-二氯苯酚)可能不会累积,而且所选除草剂的污染程度可能较低。二噁英是具有生物累积性的化学物质,可能致癌、损害神经发育、影响生殖、扰乱内分泌系统并改变免疫功能。没有向害虫管理监管局提交二噁英分析报告,且2,4-D的主要污染物并不在农药监管所涵盖的17种同系物之列。需要对组织和环境中的所有二噁英进行独立评估。2,4-D评估在医学研究的伦理、严谨性或透明度方面未达标准。加拿大需要一个更强有力的农药监管机构。当存在更安全的解决方案、风险无法明确量化或潜在风险超过益处时,不应登记潜在有毒化学品。在全国范围内减少景观美化用农药之前,地方法规和魁北克省的《农药法规》是保护公众健康的审慎措施。医生在关于农药的公众教育中可发挥作用。

相似文献

1
Pesticide assessment: Protecting public health on the home turf.农药评估:在自家地盘上保护公众健康。
Paediatr Child Health. 2006 Apr;11(4):229-34.
2
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
3
Poisoning Regulation, Research, Health, and the Environment: The Glyphosate-Based Herbicides Case in Canada.《农药管理、研究、健康与环境:加拿大草甘膦基除草剂案例》
Toxics. 2023 Jan 26;11(2):121. doi: 10.3390/toxics11020121.
4
FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.联邦杀虫剂、杀菌剂和灭鼠剂法案第五编F部分测试指南:这些测试足以检测作物保护化学品的潜在激素活性吗?
J Toxicol Environ Health. 1997 Apr 11;50(5):415-31. doi: 10.1080/00984109708983999.
5
Detection of herbicides in the urine of pet dogs following home lawn chemical application.宠物狗尿液中家庭草坪化学处理后除草剂的检测。
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jul 1;456-457:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.019. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
6
Chiral pesticides: identification, description, and environmental implications.手性农药:鉴定、描述及环境影响。
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012;217:1-74. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2329-4_1.
7
Herbicide regulation: a case study of Michigan.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1995 Fall;1(4):95-101. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199500140-00017.
8
Potential impact of the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on human and ecosystems.2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸除草剂对人类和生态系统的潜在影响。
Environ Int. 2018 Feb;111:332-351. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
9
Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.勘误:切除眼柄以增加泥蟹的卵巢成熟度。
J Vis Exp. 2023 May 26(195). doi: 10.3791/6561.
10
Post-Vietnam military herbicide exposures in UC-123 Agent Orange spray aircraft.越战期间 UC-123“枯叶剂”喷洒飞机机组人员的战后接触史。
Environ Res. 2014 Apr;130:34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Antioxidant and Protective Effects of Essential Oil Against Chlorpyrifos-Induced Kidney and Liver Injuries in Rats.精油对毒死蜱诱导的大鼠肾和肝损伤的抗氧化及保护作用
Front Physiol. 2021 Feb 24;12:618582. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.618582. eCollection 2021.
2
Oral mucosa changes associated with chronic oral and inhalation exposure to 2,4-dichlorophenoxiacetic acid (2,4-D) in Wistar rats.Wistar大鼠经口和吸入途径长期接触2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸(2,4-D)所引起的口腔黏膜变化
Toxicol Res (Camb). 2020 Nov 24;9(6):746-757. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfaa085. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Evaluation of buccal damage associated with acute inhalation exposure to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in mice.评价小鼠急性吸入 2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸(2,4-D)所致的口腔损伤。
BMC Vet Res. 2020 Jul 14;16(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02461-w.
4
Environmental determinants of chronic disease and medical approaches: recognition, avoidance, supportive therapy, and detoxification.环境因素对慢性病的影响及医学应对策略:识别、避免、支持性治疗和解毒。
J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:356798. doi: 10.1155/2012/356798. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
5
To the editor.致编辑。
Paediatr Child Health. 2006 Jul;11(6):332. doi: 10.1093/pch/11.6.332.
6
Non-cancer health effects of pesticides: systematic review and implications for family doctors.农药对非癌症健康的影响:系统评价及对家庭医生的启示
Can Fam Physician. 2007 Oct;53(10):1712-20.

本文引用的文献

1
A case for revisiting the safety of pesticides: a closer look at neurodevelopment.重新审视农药安全性的理由:深入探讨神经发育
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Jan;114(1):10-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7940.
2
Conflicts of interest and independent data analysis in industry-funded studies.
JAMA. 2005 Nov 23;294(20):2575; author reply 2576-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.20.2575-a.
3
Conflicts of interest and independent data analysis in industry-funded studies.
JAMA. 2005 Nov 23;294(20):2575-6; author reply 2576-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.20.2575-b.
4
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.世界医学协会《赫尔辛基宣言》。涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则。
Nurs Ethics. 2002 Jan;9(1):105-9. doi: 10.1191/0969733002ne486xx.
5
Reporting conflicts of interest, financial aspects of research, and role of sponsors in funded studies.报告利益冲突、研究的财务方面以及资助者在受资助研究中的作用。
JAMA. 2005 Jul 6;294(1):110-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.1.110.
6
Drug approval system questioned in US and Canada.美国和加拿大对药品审批系统提出质疑。
CMAJ. 2005 Feb 1;172(3):317-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.045312.
7
Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.临床试验注册:国际医学期刊编辑委员会的声明
JAMA. 2004 Sep 15;292(11):1363-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.11.1363. Epub 2004 Sep 8.
8
Herbicide exposure and the risk of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder in Scottish Terriers.除草剂暴露与苏格兰梗犬膀胱移行细胞癌风险
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2004 Apr 15;224(8):1290-7. doi: 10.2460/javma.2004.224.1290.
9
Genome sequencing: three's company.基因组测序:三人行。
Nature. 2004 Apr 1;428(6982):475-6. doi: 10.1038/428475a.
10
Loss of pre-B and IgM(+) B cells in the bone marrow after exposure to a mixture of herbicides.接触除草剂混合物后骨髓中前B细胞和IgM(+) B细胞的丢失。
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2003 Dec 26;66(24):2299-313. doi: 10.1080/716100638.