Hedegaard Karsten, Thyø Kathrine A, Wenzel Henrik
COWI A/S, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark, Copenhagen Energy Ltd., District heating, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Nov 1;42(21):7992-9. doi: 10.1021/es800358d.
Among the existing environmental assessments of bioethanol, the studies suggesting an environmental benefit of bioethanol all ignore the constraints on the availability of biomass resources and the implications competition for biomass has on the assessment We show that toward 2030, regardless of whether a global or European perspective is applied, the amount of biomass, which can become available for bioethanol or other energy uses, will be physically and economically constrained. This implies that use of biomass or land for bioethanol production will most likely happen at the expense of alternative uses. In this perspective, we show that for the case of a new advanced bioethanol technology, in terms of reducing greenhouse emissions and fossil fuel dependency, more is lost than gained when prioritizing biomass or land for bioethanol. Technology pathways involving heat and power production and/or biogas, natural gas or electricity for transport are advantageous.
在现有的生物乙醇环境评估中,那些表明生物乙醇具有环境效益的研究都忽略了生物质资源可用性的限制以及生物质竞争对评估的影响。我们表明,到2030年,无论从全球还是欧洲的角度来看,可用于生物乙醇或其他能源用途的生物质数量将受到物理和经济上的限制。这意味着将生物质或土地用于生物乙醇生产很可能是以牺牲其他用途为代价的。从这个角度来看,我们表明,对于一种新型先进生物乙醇技术的情况,在减少温室气体排放和化石燃料依赖方面,优先将生物质或土地用于生物乙醇时,损失大于收益。涉及热电联产和/或用于运输的沼气、天然气或电力的技术途径更具优势。