Ng J J L, Taylor D McD
Emergency Department, Austin Health, Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia 3084.
Emerg Med J. 2008 Dec;25(12):807-10. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.059725.
To determine the prevalence and nature of chest radiographic abnormalities in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected acute coronary syndrome but without signs or symptoms of other pathology.
A retrospective study was undertaken of patients presenting to a tertiary referral ED between July 2005 and June 2006. Inclusion criteria were age > or = 18 years and suspected acute coronary syndrome (as defined). Exclusion criteria were any signs or symptoms consistent with other cardio/pulmonary pathology (as defined). The study end points were the proportion of patients who had a chest radiograph, the proportion who had an abnormal chest radiograph, the nature of the abnormality and whether the radiograph changed management.
Of 158 patients who met the entrance criteria, 130 (82.2%, 95% CI 75.2% to 87.7%) underwent chest radiography. In 40 patients (30.8%, 95% CI 23.1% to 39.6%) an abnormality was reported by the radiologist, although most were of no consequence (eg, previous sternotomy). In three patients there was documented evidence that the chest radiograph altered management (one was treated for pulmonary oedema, one for pneumonia and one was investigated further for suspicious hilar nodes). In a further two patients (one with middle lobe collapse and consolidation and one with pulmonary oedema) the chest radiograph may have changed management, although this was not documented.
In the patient group examined, chest radiography resulted in a low yield of unexpected chest pathology. Routine chest radiography for this group is questionable and needs further investigation.
确定因疑似急性冠状动脉综合征而到急诊科就诊但无其他病理体征或症状的患者胸部X线异常的患病率及性质。
对2005年7月至2006年6月期间到一家三级转诊急诊科就诊的患者进行回顾性研究。纳入标准为年龄≥18岁且疑似急性冠状动脉综合征(如定义)。排除标准为任何与其他心肺病理状况相符的体征或症状(如定义)。研究终点为进行胸部X线检查的患者比例、胸部X线检查异常的患者比例、异常的性质以及X线检查是否改变了治疗方案。
在158例符合入选标准的患者中,130例(82.2%,95%可信区间75.2%至87.7%)接受了胸部X线检查。放射科医生报告40例患者(30.8%,95%可信区间23.1%至39.6%)存在异常,不过多数异常并无大碍(如既往胸骨切开术)。有3例患者有记录表明胸部X线检查改变了治疗方案(1例因肺水肿接受治疗,1例因肺炎接受治疗,1例因可疑肺门淋巴结进一步检查)。另有2例患者(1例中叶肺不张及实变,1例肺水肿)胸部X线检查可能改变了治疗方案,尽管未记录在案。
在所检查的患者群体中,胸部X线检查发现意外胸部病变的阳性率较低。对该群体进行常规胸部X线检查存在疑问,需要进一步研究。