Luo W, Li J, Fourkal E, Fan J, Xu X, Chen Z, Jin L, Price R, Ma C-M
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Dec 21;53(24):7151-66. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/24/010. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
As a clinical application of an exciting scientific breakthrough, a compact and cost-efficient proton therapy unit using high-power laser acceleration is being developed at Fox Chase Cancer Center. The significance of this application depends on whether or not it can yield dosimetric superiority over intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The goal of this study is to show how laser-accelerated proton beams with broad energy spreads can be optimally used for proton therapy including intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and achieve dosimetric superiority over IMRT for prostate cancer. Desired energies and spreads with a varying deltaE/E were selected with the particle selection device and used to generate spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBPs). Proton plans were generated on an in-house Monte Carlo-based inverse-planning system. Fifteen prostate IMRT plans previously used for patient treatment have been included for comparison. Identical dose prescriptions, beam arrangement and consistent dose constrains were used for IMRT and IMPT plans to show the dosimetric differences that were caused only by the different physical characteristics of proton and photon beams. Different optimization constrains and beam arrangements were also used to find optimal IMPT. The results show that conventional proton therapy (CPT) plans without intensity modulation were not superior to IMRT, but IMPT can generate better proton plans if appropriate beam setup and optimization are used. Compared to IMRT, IMPT can reduce the target dose heterogeneity ((D5-D95)/D95) by up to 56%. The volume receiving 65 Gy and higher (V65) for the bladder and the rectum can be reduced by up to 45% and 88%, respectively, while the volume receiving 40 Gy and higher (V40) for the bladder and the rectum can be reduced by up to 49% and 68%, respectively. IMPT can also reduce the whole body non-target tissue dose by up to 61% or a factor 2.5. This study has shown that the laser accelerator under development has a potential to generate high-quality proton beams for cancer treatment. Significant improvement in target dose uniformity and normal tissue sparing as well as in reduction of whole body dose can be achieved by IMPT with appropriate optimization and beam setup.
作为一项令人振奋的科学突破的临床应用,福克斯蔡斯癌症中心正在研发一种使用高功率激光加速的紧凑型且经济高效的质子治疗装置。该应用的意义取决于它是否能在剂量学上优于调强放射治疗(IMRT)。本研究的目的是展示具有宽能量分布的激光加速质子束如何能最佳地用于质子治疗,包括调强质子治疗(IMPT),并在前列腺癌治疗中实现比IMRT更高的剂量学优势。通过粒子选择装置选择具有不同ΔE/E的所需能量和能量分布,并用于生成扩展布拉格峰(SOBP)。质子计划是在基于蒙特卡罗的内部逆向计划系统上生成的。为了进行比较,纳入了之前用于患者治疗的15个前列腺IMRT计划。IMRT和IMPT计划使用相同的剂量处方、射束排列和一致的剂量约束,以显示仅由质子束和光子束不同物理特性引起的剂量学差异。还使用了不同的优化约束和射束排列来寻找最佳的IMPT。结果表明,未进行强度调制的传统质子治疗(CPT)计划并不优于IMRT,但如果使用适当的射束设置和优化,IMPT可以生成更好的质子计划。与IMRT相比,IMPT可将靶区剂量不均匀性((D5 - D95)/D95)降低多达56%。膀胱和直肠接受65 Gy及以上剂量的体积(V65)可分别减少多达45%和88%,而膀胱和直肠接受40 Gy及以上剂量的体积(V40)可分别减少多达49%和68%。IMPT还可将全身非靶组织剂量降低多达61%或降低2.5倍。本研究表明,正在研发的激光加速器有潜力产生用于癌症治疗的高质量质子束。通过适当的优化和射束设置,IMPT可以在靶区剂量均匀性、正常组织保护以及全身剂量降低方面取得显著改善。