Hoover Jacob G, Schumaker Annabel L, Franklin Kevin J
Department of Internal Medicine, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland AFB, San Antonio, TX 78236-5300, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Sep;54(9):1947-52. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0568-4. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
To evaluate intravenous proton-pump inhibitor (IV PPI) prescribing in a single academic teaching hospital.
A retrospective pilot study of 107 patients in a single United States military teaching hospital was conducted over a 1-month period. Clinical data were collected and analyzed for demographic features, prior medication use, admission hemoglobin level, service prescribing the IV PPI, indication for IV PPI, IV PPI treatment duration, gastroenterology consultant use, endoscopic findings, and blood products given. Indications for use were compared with current established guidelines to determine appropriate usage.
A total of 683 doses of IV pantoprazole were prescribed over a 1-month period. Seventy-six patients (71%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 62-79%) who received IV PPIs did not meet the criteria for an appropriate indication for use. Ninety-nine patients in the study (93%; 95% CI, 86-96%) met criteria for an acceptable dosage given. The most common appropriate indication given was stress ulcer prophylaxis in a high-risk setting (13%; 95% CI, 8-21%) with appropriate use of this indication 45% of the time (95% CI, 29-62%). IV PPIs were appropriately prescribed most often by the medical intensive care unit (66.7%; 95% CI, 43-84%) and least often by the surgical wards services (16%; 95% CI, 7-33%). No discernable indication was given in 52% of cases (95% CI, 43-62%), and patients were not actually nil per os in 46% of these instances (95% CI, 34-59%).
Intravenous PPI prescribing habits in this military hospital facility are poor. A multifaceted approach including physician/pharmacist education, IV PPI ordering templates, and a consensus medical position statement from a major gastroenterological or prominent medical association may lead to more appropriate use.
评估一家学术教学医院中静脉质子泵抑制剂(IV PPI)的处方情况。
在一家美国军队教学医院对107例患者进行了为期1个月的回顾性试点研究。收集临床数据并分析人口统计学特征、既往用药情况、入院时血红蛋白水平、开具IV PPI的科室、IV PPI的使用指征、IV PPI治疗时长、胃肠病学顾问的使用情况、内镜检查结果以及输注的血液制品。将使用指征与当前既定指南进行比较以确定使用是否恰当。
在1个月期间共开具了683剂静脉泮托拉唑。接受IV PPI的76例患者(71%;95%置信区间[CI],62 - 79%)不符合恰当使用指征标准。研究中的99例患者(93%;95% CI,86 - 96%)符合可接受剂量标准。最常见的恰当使用指征是在高危情况下预防应激性溃疡(13%;95% CI,8 - 21%),该指征的恰当使用率为45%(95% CI,29 - 62%)。IV PPI最常由医学重症监护病房恰当开具(66.7%;95% CI,43 - 84%),而外科病房服务开具最少(16%;95% CI,7 - 33%)。52%的病例(95% CI,43 - 62%)未给出可识别的使用指征,在这些情况中46%的患者实际上并非禁食(95% CI,34 - 59%)。
这家军队医院机构中静脉PPI的处方习惯不佳。采取多方面措施,包括医生/药剂师教育、IV PPI医嘱模板以及主要胃肠病学或知名医学协会的共识性医学立场声明,可能会促使更恰当的使用。