Jia Gui-Jun, Wan Wei-Qing, Ni Ming, Jia Wang, Zhou Da-Biao, Zhang Bing-Ke, Guan Shu-Sen, Zhang Jun-Ting
Department of Neurosurgery and Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Jun 17;88(23):1627-9.
To investigate and elucidate how to preserve the pituitary stalk in the microsurgery of giant pituitary adenoma (GPA) and its clinical significance.
45 GPA patients, 23 males and 22 female; aged 40.8, including 12 cases of invasive pituitary adenoma (IPA) underwent craniotomy based on the respective preoperative neuroradiological imaging characteristics. The anatomical relationship between the pituitary stalk and tumor was recorded. The methods to protect the pituitary stalk were summarized.
Total tumor excision was achieved in 25 patients (55.5%), near-total resection was done in 12 (26.7%), and subtotal resection in 8 (17.8%). During the surgical proceeding, the pituitary stalk was distinguished from the tumor and preserved well in all 33 cases with non-invasive giant pituitary adenoma. On the contrary, in the 12 cases of invasive giant pituitary adenoma (IPA) the pituitary stalk was visualized in only 7 cases. In the patients with visualized pituitary stalks 4 pituitary stalks were not identified very well. In most cases (91%) the pituitary stalks were located laterally (on the left or right side) or supero-posterior to the tumor, only a few were located anteriorly. In all 12 IPA patients 2 cases of postoperative hemorrhage occurred associated with remnant tumor and immediate hematoma evacuation was performed, however, one patient died due to hypothalamus injury.
Pituitary stalk has various anatomical relationships to the entity of GPA; most are located lateral or supero-posterior to the tumor. However, the relationship between the stalk and tumor is not clear in IPA. Identifying and preserving the pituitary stalk well during surgical manipulation will be beneficial to get an excellent outcome.
探讨并阐明在巨大垂体腺瘤(GPA)显微手术中如何保留垂体柄及其临床意义。
45例GPA患者,男23例,女22例;年龄40.8岁,其中12例侵袭性垂体腺瘤(IPA)患者根据术前各自的神经放射影像学特征接受了开颅手术。记录垂体柄与肿瘤之间的解剖关系。总结保护垂体柄的方法。
25例(55.5%)实现肿瘤全切,12例(26.7%)近全切,8例(17.8%)次全切。手术过程中,33例非侵袭性巨大垂体腺瘤患者的垂体柄均能与肿瘤区分并得到良好保留。相反,12例侵袭性巨大垂体腺瘤患者中仅7例能看清垂体柄。在看清垂体柄的患者中,4例垂体柄辨认不清。多数情况下(91%)垂体柄位于肿瘤的外侧(左侧或右侧)或后上方,仅少数位于前方。12例IPA患者中2例术后发生与残留肿瘤相关的出血,当即进行了血肿清除,但1例患者因下丘脑损伤死亡。
垂体柄与GPA实体有多种解剖关系;多数位于肿瘤的外侧或后上方。然而,在IPA中垂体柄与肿瘤的关系不明确。手术操作中准确辨认并妥善保留垂体柄将有利于获得良好的手术效果。