Leiblum Sandra R, Seehuus Martin
New Jersey Center for Sexual Wellness, Bedminister, NJ, USA.
J Sex Med. 2009 Feb;6(2):469-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01077.x. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
Although persistent genital arousal disorder (PGAD) has been mistaken for hypersexuality, there is no research documenting the sexual functioning of PGAD women to support or refute such an assumption.
To compare the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores of PGAD women to that of women diagnosed with female sexual arousal syndrome (FSAD) and healthy controls.
The FSFI scores of heterosexual women who met all five features qualifying for a diagnosis of PGAD (N = 172) on an online questionnaire were compared with previously published FSFI scores of women diagnosed with FSAD (N = 128) and healthy controls (N = 131).
Total and subscale scores on the FSFI.
On every subscale of the FSFI with the exception of desire, the PGAD women obtained scores between that of the FSAD and the healthy control group. The FSAD women displayed the greatest problems in desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, and pain while women with PGAD reported somewhat more desire than the control group but did not meet the cutoff score for sexual dysfunction. PGAD women are more similar to the normal control group than women with FSAD.
There is no evidence to support the belief that women who meet criteria for a diagnosis of PGAD are "hypersexual." In fact, their overall sexual functioning falls within the normal range and is significantly better than that of women diagnosed with FSAD.
尽管持续性性唤起障碍(PGAD)曾被误认为是性欲亢进,但尚无研究记录PGAD女性的性功能来支持或反驳这一假设。
比较PGAD女性与被诊断为女性性唤起综合征(FSAD)的女性及健康对照组的女性性功能指数(FSFI)得分。
将在在线问卷上符合PGAD诊断的所有五项特征的异性恋女性(N = 172)的FSFI得分与先前发表的被诊断为FSAD的女性(N = 128)及健康对照组(N = 131)的FSFI得分进行比较。
FSFI的总分及各分量表得分。
除性欲分量表外,PGAD女性在FSFI的每个分量表上的得分均介于FSAD女性和健康对照组之间。FSAD女性在性欲、性唤起、润滑、性高潮和疼痛方面表现出最大的问题,而PGAD女性报告的性欲略高于对照组,但未达到性功能障碍的临界分数。与FSAD女性相比,PGAD女性与正常对照组更为相似。
没有证据支持符合PGAD诊断标准的女性是“性欲亢进”的观点。事实上,她们的整体性功能处于正常范围内,且明显优于被诊断为FSAD的女性。