• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科对严重头痛的应用。一项基于人群的研究。

Use of the emergency department for severe headache. A population-based study.

作者信息

Friedman Benjamin W, Serrano Daniel, Reed Michael, Diamond Merle, Lipton Richard B

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, NY 10467, USA.

出版信息

Headache. 2009 Jan;49(1):21-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01282.x. Epub 2008 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01282.x
PMID:19040677
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2615458/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although headache is a common emergency department (ED) chief complaint, the role of the ED in the management of primary headache disorders has rarely been assessed from a population perspective. We determined frequency of ED use and risk factors for use among patients suffering severe headache.

METHODS

As part of the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention study, a validated self-administered questionnaire was mailed to 24,000 severe headache sufferers, who were randomly drawn from a larger sample constructed to be sociodemographically representative of the US population. Participants were asked a series of questions on headache management, healthcare system use, sociodemographic features, and number of ED visits for management of headache in the previous 12 months. In keeping with the work of others, "frequent" ED use was defined as a participant's report of 4 or more visits to the ED for treatment of a headache in the previous 12 months. Headaches were categorized into specific diagnoses using a validated methodology.

RESULTS

Of 24,000 surveys, 18,514 were returned, and 13,451 (56%) provided complete data on ED use. Sociodemographic characteristics did not differ substantially between responders and nonresponders. Among the 13,451 responders, over the course of the previous year, 12,592 (94%) did not visit the ED at all, 415 (3%) visited the ED once, and 444 (3%) visited the ED more than once. Patients with severe episodic tension-type headache were less likely to use the ED than patients with severe episodic migraine (OR 0.4 [95% CI: 0.3, 0.6]). Frequent ED use was reported by 1% of the total sample or 19% (95% CI: 17%, 22%) of subjects who used the ED in the previous year, although frequent users accounted for 51% (95% CI: 49%, 53%) of all ED visits. Predictors of ED use included markers of disease severity, elevated depression scores, low socioeconomic status, and a predilection for ED use for conditions other than headache.

CONCLUSIONS

Most individuals suffering severe headaches do not use the ED over the course of a single year. The majority of ED visits for severe headache are accounted for by a small subset of all ED users. Increasing disease severity and depression are the most readily addressable factors associated with ED use.

摘要

背景

尽管头痛是急诊科常见的主诉,但从人群角度对急诊科在原发性头痛疾病管理中的作用进行评估的情况却很少见。我们确定了重度头痛患者使用急诊科的频率及其使用的危险因素。

方法

作为美国偏头痛患病率与预防研究的一部分,一份经过验证的自填式问卷被邮寄给了24000名重度头痛患者,这些患者是从一个更大的样本中随机抽取的,该样本在社会人口统计学上具有美国人群的代表性。参与者被问及一系列关于头痛管理、医疗系统使用、社会人口学特征以及过去12个月内因头痛管理而就诊急诊科的次数等问题。与其他人的研究一致,“频繁”使用急诊科被定义为参与者报告在过去12个月内因头痛治疗而就诊急诊科4次或更多次。使用经过验证的方法将头痛分类为特定诊断。

结果

在24000份调查问卷中,18514份被退回,13451份(56%)提供了关于急诊科使用的完整数据。应答者和未应答者的社会人口学特征没有实质性差异。在13451名应答者中,在过去一年中,12592名(94%)根本没有去过急诊科,415名(3%)去过急诊科一次,444名(3%)去过急诊科不止一次。重度发作性紧张型头痛患者比重度发作性偏头痛患者使用急诊科的可能性更小(比值比0.4[95%置信区间:0.3,0.6])。总样本中有1%或上一年使用过急诊科的受试者中有19%(95%置信区间:17%,22%)报告频繁使用急诊科,尽管频繁使用者占所有急诊科就诊次数的51%(95%置信区间:49%,53%)。急诊科使用的预测因素包括疾病严重程度指标、抑郁评分升高、社会经济地位低以及除头痛外对其他疾病倾向于使用急诊科。

结论

大多数重度头痛患者在一年中不会使用急诊科。所有急诊科使用者中的一小部分占了因重度头痛而就诊急诊科的大部分人次。疾病严重程度增加和抑郁是与急诊科使用相关的最容易解决的因素。

相似文献

1
Use of the emergency department for severe headache. A population-based study.急诊科对严重头痛的应用。一项基于人群的研究。
Headache. 2009 Jan;49(1):21-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01282.x. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
2
Less is not more: underutilization of headache medications in a university hospital emergency department.少并非多:大学医院急诊科头痛药物使用不足
Headache. 2007 Sep;47(8):1125-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00846.x.
3
Factors associated with emergency department visits for migraine: an observational study.偏头痛急诊就诊相关因素:一项观察性研究。
Headache. 2014 Nov-Dec;54(10):1611-8. doi: 10.1111/head.12461. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
4
The association between headache and elevated blood pressure among patients presenting to an ED.急诊就诊患者中头痛与血压升高之间的关联。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;32(9):976-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.05.017. Epub 2014 May 20.
5
Healthcare resource utilization and direct costs associated with frequent nausea in episodic migraine: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study.与发作性偏头痛频繁恶心相关的医疗资源利用和直接成本:来自美国偏头痛患病率和预防(AMPP)研究的结果。
J Med Econ. 2013;16(4):490-9. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.770748. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
6
Prescribing practices of migraine-specific pharmacotherapy associated with emergency department use for migraine.与偏头痛急诊就诊相关的偏头痛特异性药物治疗的处方实践
Headache. 2021 Mar;61(3):455-461. doi: 10.1111/head.14029. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
7
Headache etiology in a pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科的头痛病因
Pediatr Emerg Care. 1997 Feb;13(1):1-4. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199702000-00001.
8
Characterization and prediction of emergency department use in chronic daily headache patients.慢性每日头痛患者急诊科使用情况的特征分析与预测
Headache. 2005 Jul-Aug;45(7):891-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.05157.x.
9
A Brief Look at Urgent Care Visits for Migraine: The Care Received and Ideas to Guide Migraine Care in this Proliferating Medical Setting.偏头痛紧急护理就诊简览:在这个不断发展的医疗环境中所接受的护理以及指导偏头痛护理的思路
Headache. 2020 Mar;60(3):542-552. doi: 10.1111/head.13717. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
10
The prevalence and burden of migraine and severe headache in the United States: updated statistics from government health surveillance studies.美国偏头痛和重度头痛的患病率及负担:政府健康监测研究的最新统计数据
Headache. 2015 Jan;55(1):21-34. doi: 10.1111/head.12482.

引用本文的文献

1
Hallmarks of primary headache: part 1 - migraine.原发性头痛的特征:第 1 部分 - 偏头痛。
J Headache Pain. 2024 Oct 31;25(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01889-x.
2
Profiles of frequent emergency department users with chronic conditions: a latent class analysis.有慢性疾病的频繁急诊患者特征:潜在类别分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 29;12(9):e055297. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055297.
3
Factors Associated with Over-the-Counter Analgesic Overuse among Individuals Experiencing Headache.头痛患者非处方镇痛药过度使用的相关因素
Clin Pract. 2022 Sep 5;12(5):714-722. doi: 10.3390/clinpract12050074.
4
Frequency, Demographics, Comorbidities, and Health Care Utilization by Veterans With Migraine: A VA Nationwide Cohort Study.偏头痛退伍军人的频率、人口统计学特征、合并症和医疗保健利用:一项退伍军人事务部全国队列研究。
Neurology. 2022 Oct 31;99(18):e1979-e1992. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200888.
5
Characteristics and Gender Differences of Headache in the Veterans Health Administration: A National Cohort Study, Fiscal Year 2008-2019.特征与性别差异的头痛在退伍军人健康管理局:一项全国性队列研究,2008 财年至 2019 财年。
Neurology. 2022 Oct 31;99(18):e1993-e2005. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200905.
6
Characteristics and Resource Utilization Associated with Frequent Users of Emergency Departments.急诊科频繁使用者的特征及资源利用情况
Emerg Med Int. 2022 Jul 21;2022:8064011. doi: 10.1155/2022/8064011. eCollection 2022.
7
Headache in the Neurological Emergency Department-High Degree of Inadequate Documentation Calls for Structured Assessments.神经科急诊科的头痛——记录不充分情况严重,需要进行结构化评估。
Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 24;13:847484. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.847484. eCollection 2022.
8
Multidisciplinary Firms and the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Case Study of Low Back Pain.多学科公司与慢性疼痛治疗:以腰痛为例的案例研究
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 10;2:781433. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2021.781433. eCollection 2021.
9
Spinal Cord Stimulation as Treatment for Cancer and Chemotherapy-Induced Pain.脊髓刺激作为癌症和化疗引起疼痛的治疗方法。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 24;2:699993. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2021.699993. eCollection 2021.
10
Diagnosis, consultation, treatment, and impact of migraine in the US: Results of the OVERCOME (US) study.美国偏头痛的诊断、咨询、治疗和影响:OVERCOME(美国)研究的结果。
Headache. 2022 Feb;62(2):122-140. doi: 10.1111/head.14259. Epub 2022 Jan 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of nonnarcotic protocol for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic nonmalignant pain.非麻醉方案治疗慢性非恶性疼痛急性加重的有效性
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 May;25(4):445-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.09.018.
2
Patterns of diagnosis and acute and preventive treatment for migraine in the United States: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention study.美国偏头痛的诊断模式以及急性和预防性治疗:美国偏头痛患病率与预防研究的结果
Headache. 2007 Mar;47(3):355-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00631.x.
3
Nurse-initiated, titrated intravenous opioid analgesia reduces time to analgesia for selected painful conditions.护士主导的、滴定的静脉内阿片类药物镇痛可减少选定疼痛病症的镇痛起效时间。
CJEM. 2005 May;7(3):149-54. doi: 10.1017/s148180350001318x.
4
Crisis in the emergency department.急诊科的危机。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 28;355(13):1300-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068194.
5
Characteristics of frequent users of emergency departments.急诊科频繁使用者的特征。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Jul;48(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.030. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
6
Predictors of frequent emergency department utilization in Southeastern Pennsylvania.宾夕法尼亚州东南部急诊科频繁就诊的预测因素。
J Asthma. 2006 Apr;43(3):219-23. doi: 10.1080/02770900600567015.
7
Reasons for using the emergency department: results of the EMPATH Study.使用急诊科的原因:共情研究结果
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Dec;12(12):1158-66. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.030. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
8
Characterization and prediction of emergency department use in chronic daily headache patients.慢性每日头痛患者急诊科使用情况的特征分析与预测
Headache. 2005 Jul-Aug;45(7):891-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.05157.x.
9
Asthma exacerbations in North American adults: who are the "frequent fliers" in the emergency department?北美成年人哮喘急性加重:谁是急诊科的“常客”?
Chest. 2005 May;127(5):1579-86. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.5.1579.
10
Migraine: epidemiology, impact, and risk factors for progression.偏头痛:流行病学、影响及病情进展的风险因素
Headache. 2005 Apr;45 Suppl 1:S3-S13. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.4501001.x.