• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗德黑兰城市污水系统对儿童腹泻的影响:一项同期对照现场试验。

The impact of an urban sewerage system on childhood diarrhoea in Tehran, Iran: a concurrent control field trial.

作者信息

Kolahi Ali-Asghar, Rastegarpour Ali, Sohrabi Mohammad-Reza

机构信息

Shahid Beheshti University, M.C., Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Evin, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009 May;103(5):500-5. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.10.016. Epub 2008 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.10.016
PMID:19041111
Abstract

The stepwise implementation of the Tehran Sewerage Project provided a convenient setting for which health impacts of an urban sewerage system could be examined with appropriate controls. In 2001, Tehran municipal districts 17 and 18 had no sewerage system connections, but areas within these districts had been planned to be connected by 2006. These areas were chosen as an intervention group. Neighbouring areas, with a similar socio-economic status, that had not been planned to connect to the sewerage system by 2006, were chosen as controls. Homes within designated areas were randomized and surveyed twice to determine diarrhoea incidences for children aged 6-60 months, once in 2001, before connection to the sewerage system, and once again in 2006, after the intervention. By 2006, 76% of the homes in the intervention zones were connected to the sewerage system. In the first stage of the study, diarrhoea incidences for intervention and control groups were 18.6 and 16.6%, respectively. In the second stage, incidences decreased to 10.1 and 10.5%, respectively. Data collected from 4179 children demonstrated that the diarrhoea incidence had decreased by 46% in the intervention group, whereas it had decreased by 37% in the controls.

摘要

德黑兰污水处理项目的逐步实施为在适当控制条件下研究城市污水处理系统对健康的影响提供了便利环境。2001年,德黑兰第17和18市政区没有污水处理系统连接,但这些区内的区域计划在2006年前实现连接。这些区域被选为干预组。选择社会经济地位相似、且计划在2006年前不与污水处理系统连接的邻近区域作为对照组。对指定区域内的家庭进行随机抽样并进行两次调查,以确定6至60个月大儿童的腹泻发病率,一次是在2001年连接污水处理系统之前,另一次是在2006年干预之后。到2006年,干预区76%的家庭连接到了污水处理系统。在研究的第一阶段,干预组和对照组的腹泻发病率分别为18.6%和16.6%。在第二阶段,发病率分别降至10.1%和10.5%。从4179名儿童收集的数据表明,干预组的腹泻发病率下降了46%,而对照组下降了37%。

相似文献

1
The impact of an urban sewerage system on childhood diarrhoea in Tehran, Iran: a concurrent control field trial.伊朗德黑兰城市污水系统对儿童腹泻的影响:一项同期对照现场试验。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009 May;103(5):500-5. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.10.016. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
2
Environmental and personal hygiene practices: risk factors for diarrhoea among children of Nigerian market women.环境与个人卫生习惯:尼日利亚市场女性子女腹泻的风险因素
J Diarrhoeal Dis Res. 1998 Dec;16(4):241-7.
3
Water disinfection and hygiene behaviour in an urban slum in Kenya: impact on childhood diarrhoea and influence of beliefs.肯尼亚一个城市贫民窟的水消毒与卫生行为:对儿童腹泻的影响及信念的作用
Int J Environ Health Res. 2008 Oct;18(5):335-55. doi: 10.1080/09603120801966050.
4
Impact of a city-wide sanitation intervention in a large urban centre on social, environmental and behavioural determinants of childhood diarrhoea: analysis of two cohort studies.大型城市中心全市范围卫生干预措施对儿童腹泻的社会、环境及行为决定因素的影响:两项队列研究分析
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;37(4):831-40. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn101.
5
Impact of drainage and sewerage on diarrhoea in poor urban areas in Salvador, Brazil.排水与污水处理对巴西萨尔瓦多贫困城区腹泻情况的影响。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Mar-Apr;97(2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(03)90104-0.
6
On the incidence of diarrhoea among young Indian children.关于印度幼儿腹泻的发病率
Econ Hum Biol. 2004 Mar;2(1):119-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2003.12.005.
7
A measure for provisional-and-urgent sanitary improvement in developing countries: septic-tank performance improvement.发展中国家临时和紧急卫生改善措施:化粪池性能提升。
Water Sci Technol. 2008;58(6):1305-11. doi: 10.2166/wst.2008.715.
8
Periodic deworming with albendazole and its impact on growth status and diarrhoeal incidence among children in an urban slum of India.在印度一个城市贫民窟中,使用阿苯达唑进行定期驱虫及其对儿童生长状况和腹泻发病率的影响。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2005 Apr;99(4):261-7. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2004.08.005.
9
Childhood diarrhoea symptoms, management and duration: observations from a longitudinal community study.儿童腹泻症状、管理与病程:一项纵向社区研究的观察结果
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2005 Jun;99(6):407-16. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2004.07.007.
10
The MobiSan approach: informal settlements of Cape Town, South Africa.MobiSan 方法:南非开普敦的非正规住区。
Water Sci Technol. 2010;61(12):3078-90. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.225.

引用本文的文献

1
Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene for Everyone Intervention Study: Protocol for a Controlled Before-and-After Trial.人人享有水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预研究:一项前后对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 15;14:e68280. doi: 10.2196/68280.
2
Interventions promoting uptake of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) technologies in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence and gap map of effectiveness studies.促进低收入和中等收入国家采用水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)技术的干预措施:有效性研究的证据与差距图
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 8;17(4):e1194. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1194. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Interventions to improve sanitation for preventing diarrhoea.
改善环境卫生以预防腹泻的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 25;1(1):CD013328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013328.pub2.
4
Does Basic Sanitation Prevent Diarrhea? Contextualizing Recent Intervention Trials through a Historical Lens.基本卫生措施能否预防腹泻?从历史角度看近期干预试验的背景。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 28;17(1):230. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010230.
5
Randomised and non-randomised studies to estimate the effect of community-level public health interventions: definitions and methodological considerations.评估社区层面公共卫生干预措施效果的随机和非随机研究:定义与方法学考量
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2017 Sep 7;14:9. doi: 10.1186/s12982-017-0063-5. eCollection 2017.
6
The Influence of Household- and Community-Level Sanitation and Fecal Sludge Management on Urban Fecal Contamination in Households and Drains and Enteric Infection in Children.家庭和社区层面的卫生设施及粪便污泥管理对家庭和排水管道中城市粪便污染及儿童肠道感染的影响
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Jun;96(6):1404-1414. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0170.
7
Household sanitation is associated with lower risk of bacterial and protozoal enteric infections, but not viral infections and diarrhoea, in a cohort study in a low-income urban neighbourhood in Vellore, India.在印度韦洛尔一个低收入城市社区进行的一项队列研究中,家庭卫生设施与细菌性和原生动物性肠道感染风险较低相关,但与病毒感染及腹泻无关。
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Sep;22(9):1119-1129. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12915. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
8
Effects of neighbourhood and household sanitation conditions on diarrhea morbidity: Systematic review and meta-analysis.社区及家庭卫生条件对腹泻发病率的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 15;12(3):e0173808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173808. eCollection 2017.
9
A controlled, before-and-after trial of an urban sanitation intervention to reduce enteric infections in children: research protocol for the Maputo Sanitation (MapSan) study, Mozambique.一项关于城市卫生干预措施以减少儿童肠道感染的对照前后试验:莫桑比克马普托卫生(MapSan)研究的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 18;5(6):e008215. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008215.
10
The cost of a knowledge silo: a systematic re-review of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions.知识孤岛的代价:对水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施的系统性重新审查
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Jun;30(5):660-74. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu039. Epub 2014 May 29.