Mitchell Jim, Bradley Don, Wilson Jim, Goins R Turner
Department of Sociology, Center on Aging, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858-4354, USA.
J Agromedicine. 2008;13(2):95-109. doi: 10.1080/10599240802125383.
This article explores the potential and the promise of convergence between gerontological and occupational health researchers to better understand challenges faced by aging farmers including declining economic viability of family farms, the aging of the population of working farmers, and probability of work-related injury or disability among older farmers. Although the need for research seems obvious, the economic, demographic, and psychosocial dynamics of continued work among aging farmers is under-studied in the occupational health literature and absent in the gerontological literature. Following examination of studies of aging farmers drawn from the occupational health literature, we review studies of rural aging in the gerontological literature. First, we compare varying definitions of rural across federal agencies that impact the ability of researchers using these data to examine variability across rural places. Next, we review studies based upon primary data that include rural residence among their independent variables. We describe different definitions of rural residence across federal agencies with an eye toward their methodological and conceptual impact on the rural aging literature. Then we describe inadequate and incomplete definition and measurement of rural residence across published studies of primary data. Following discussion of the implications of these shortcomings for rural aging research including farmers and others engaged in extractive activities, we discuss the potential for joint work among gerontologists and occupational health researchers to better understand the significance of aging for transition in the agricultural economy and the viability of family farms. We recommend attention to the definition and measurement of rural residence to include variability in rural farm and non-farm populations and refocusing the occupational health literature on aging farmers to include a life course perspective from gerontological theory applied through longitudinal research designs.
本文探讨了老年学和职业健康研究人员之间融合的潜力和前景,以便更好地理解老龄化农民所面临的挑战,包括家庭农场经济活力下降、从事农业劳动的人口老龄化以及老年农民工伤或致残的可能性。尽管开展相关研究的必要性似乎显而易见,但职业健康文献对老龄化农民继续工作的经济、人口和社会心理动态研究不足,而老年学文献中则未涉及这方面内容。在审视了职业健康文献中有关老龄化农民的研究后,我们回顾了老年学文献中关于农村老龄化的研究。首先,我们比较了各联邦机构对农村的不同定义,这些定义影响了使用这些数据的研究人员考察不同农村地区差异的能力。接下来,我们回顾了基于主要数据的研究,这些研究将农村居住情况纳入其自变量。我们描述了各联邦机构对农村居住的不同定义,并关注其对农村老龄化文献在方法论和概念上的影响。然后,我们描述了已发表的主要数据研究中对农村居住定义和测量的不足与不完整之处。在讨论了这些不足对农村老龄化研究(包括农民和其他从事采掘活动的人群)的影响后,我们探讨了老年学家和职业健康研究人员开展联合工作的潜力,以便更好地理解老龄化对农业经济转型和家庭农场生存能力的意义。我们建议关注农村居住的定义和测量,将农村农场和非农场人口的差异纳入其中,并使职业健康文献重新聚焦于老龄化农民,纳入从老年学理论应用于纵向研究设计得出的生命历程视角。