Boers D, van Amelsvoort L, Colosio C, Corsini E, Fustinoni S, Campo L, Bosetti C, La Vecchia C, Vergieva T, Tarkowski M, Liesivuori J, Steerenberg P, van Loveren H
Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2008 Sep;27(9):721-7. doi: 10.1177/0960327108100001.
We conducted a multicenter prospective study to assess the effects of occupational exposure to ethylenebisdithiocarbamate fungicides and/or other pesticides on self-reported asthma and asthmatic symptoms. This multicenter study was conducted among 248 workers exposed to pesticides and 231 non-exposed workers from five field studies. The five field studies were carried out in The Netherlands, Italy, Finland, and two studies in Bulgaria. Subjects constituting this cohort completed a self-administered questionnaire at baseline (before the start of exposure). Ethylenethiourea in urine was determined to assess exposure to ethylenebisdithiocarbamates. In multivariate analyses adjusted for all potential confounders (age, education, residence, smoking, gender, and field study), we found inverse associations, all not statistically significant, between occupational exposure to pesticides and asthma diagnosis (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.15-1.11), complains of chest tightness (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.36-1.02), wheeze (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.32-0.98), asthma attack (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.12-2.25), and asthma medication (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.25-2.53). Furthermore, we reported null associations for multivariate analysis using ethylenethiourea as determinant for exposure. Although exposure to pesticides remains a potential health risk, our results do not suggest an association between exposure to ethylenebisdithiocarbamates and/or other pesticides used in our study on asthma and asthmatic symptoms.
我们开展了一项多中心前瞻性研究,以评估职业性接触乙撑双二硫代氨基甲酸盐类杀菌剂和/或其他农药对自我报告的哮喘及哮喘症状的影响。这项多中心研究在五项实地研究中的248名接触农药的工人和231名未接触农药的工人中进行。这五项实地研究分别在荷兰、意大利、芬兰开展,还有两项在保加利亚开展。构成该队列的受试者在基线时(接触开始前)完成了一份自填式问卷。测定尿中的乙撑硫脲以评估对乙撑双二硫代氨基甲酸盐类的接触情况。在针对所有潜在混杂因素(年龄、教育程度、居住地、吸烟、性别和实地研究)进行调整的多变量分析中,我们发现,职业性接触农药与哮喘诊断(比值比0.41;95%置信区间0.15 - 1.11)、胸闷主诉(比值比0.60;95%置信区间0.36 - 1.02)、喘息(比值比0.56;95%置信区间0.32 - 0.98)、哮喘发作(比值比0.52;95%置信区间0.12 - 2.25)和哮喘药物治疗(比值比0.79;95%置信区间0.25 - 2.53)之间存在负相关,但均无统计学意义。此外,我们报告了以乙撑硫脲作为接触决定因素的多变量分析结果为无关联。虽然接触农药仍然是一种潜在的健康风险,但我们的结果并未表明在我们的研究中接触乙撑双二硫代氨基甲酸盐类和/或其他农药与哮喘及哮喘症状之间存在关联。