Suppr超能文献

欧洲多中心现场研究中用于评估乙撑双二硫代氨基甲酸盐暴露情况的生物监测与问卷调查

Biological monitoring and questionnaire for assessing exposure to ethylenebisdithiocarbamates in a multicenter European field study.

作者信息

Fustinoni S, Campo L, Liesivuori J, Pennanen S, Vergieva T, van Amelsvoort Lgpm, Bosetti C, Van Loveren H, Colosio C

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Milan and Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Hum Exp Toxicol. 2008 Sep;27(9):681-91. doi: 10.1177/0960327108100003.

Abstract

This study deals with pesticide exposure profile in some European countries with a specific focus on ethylenebisdithiocarbamates (EBDC). In all, 55 Bulgarian greenhouse workers, 51 Finnish potato farmers, 48 Italian vineyard workers, 42 Dutch floriculture farmers, and 52 Bulgarian zineb producers entered the study. Each group was matched with a group of not occupationally exposed subjects. Exposure data were gained through self-administered questionnaires and measuring ethylenethiourea (ETU) in two spot urine samples collected, respectively, before the beginning of seasonal exposure (T0), and after 30 days, at the end of the exposure period (T30). Controls underwent a similar protocol. Study agriculture workers were involved in mixing and loading pesticides, application of pesticide mixture with mechanical or manual equipments, re-entry activities, and cleaning equipments. Chemical workers were involved in synthesis, quality controls, and packing activities. The number of pesticides to whom these subjects were exposed varied from one (zineb production) to eight (potato farmers). The use of personal protective devices was variegate and regarded both aerial and dermal penetration routes. EBDC exposure, assessed by T30 urinary ETU, was found to follow the order: greenhouse workers, zineb producers, vineyard workers, potato farmers, floriculture farmers with median levels of 49.6, 23.0, 11.8, 7.5, and 0.9 microg/g creatinine; the last group having ETU at the same level of controls (approximately 0.5 microg/g creatinine). Among agriculture workers, pesticide application, especially using manual equipment, seems to be the major determinant in explaining internal dose. Although the analysis of self-administered questionnaires evidenced difficulties especially related to lack and/or poor quality of reported data, biological monitoring confirms to be a powerful tool in assessing pesticide exposure.

摘要

本研究探讨了一些欧洲国家的农药暴露情况,特别关注亚乙基双二硫代氨基甲酸盐(EBDC)。共有55名保加利亚温室工人、51名芬兰马铃薯种植户、48名意大利葡萄园工人、42名荷兰花卉种植户以及52名保加利亚代森锌生产商参与了该研究。每个组都与一组非职业暴露对象进行了匹配。暴露数据通过自行填写的问卷获得,并分别在季节性暴露开始前(T0)和暴露期结束后30天(T30)采集的两份即时尿样中测量乙撑硫脲(ETU)来获取。对照组采用类似的方案。参与研究的农业工人从事农药的混合与装载、使用机械或手动设备施用农药混合物、重新进入作业以及清洁设备等工作。化学工人则参与合成、质量控制和包装活动。这些受试者接触的农药种类数量从一种(代森锌生产)到八种(马铃薯种植户)不等。个人防护设备的使用情况各不相同,同时考虑了空气传播和皮肤渗透途径。通过T30尿样中的ETU评估的EBDC暴露情况如下:温室工人、代森锌生产商、葡萄园工人、马铃薯种植户、花卉种植户,肌酐中位数水平分别为49.6、23.0、11.8、7.5和0.9微克/克;最后一组的ETU水平与对照组相同(约0.5微克/克肌酐)。在农业工人中,施用农药,尤其是使用手动设备,似乎是解释体内剂量的主要决定因素。尽管对自行填写问卷的分析显示存在困难,尤其是与报告数据的缺乏和/或质量差有关,但生物监测证实是评估农药暴露的有力工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验