Górski Piotr
Instytut Spraw Publicznych, Wydział Zarzadzania i Komunikacji Społecznej, Uniwersytet Jagielloński.
Kwart Hist Nauki Tech. 2007;52(3-4):131-64.
The paper deals with the issue of Polish intelligentsia in the inter-war period (1918-1939). In the introduction, the author presents various approaches that can be adopted in investigating this problem, approaches that focus on the analysis of the social awareness of that social stratum and on its transformations form the perspective of social structure. Further on in the paper, the author points to the image of Polish intelligentsia of that period as it emerges from an analysis of the feature writing of the period, i.e. to the image of the intelligentsia's self-awareness, and to the image that is revealed in the writings of historians of the inter-war period. Finally, in the main section of the paper, the author presents the views of four sociologists who lived and worked in the interwar period who dealt with the issue of the Polish intelligentsia: Florian Znaniecki (1882-1958), Aleksander Hertz (1895-1983), Stanisław Rychliński (1903-1944) and Józef Chałasiński (1904-1979). The views of those sociologists are juxtaposed with opinions of journalists and historians, to see how valuable and original such views were. Their views on the intelligentsia are also analysed against the background of the developments in sociology of that period, of the areas or interest of the sociologists involved, and of the theoretical frameworks which they followed. The sociologists' research on the intelligentsia can be seen as part of a wider range of studies on transformations in culture (Znaniecki, Hertz) and social structure (Rychliński, Chałasiński). All four sociologists pointed to the changes that the Polish intelligentsia was subject to and to the problems involved in implementing its leadership role. Apart from Chałasiński, the sociologists appreciated the positive role of the intelligentsia in Polish society and indicated the need to take measures aimed at reconstructing the paths of advancement into the social elite, a great role in which was attributed to educational institutions. The issues of social advancement, and especially the discussions concerning the social elite, were well in tune with debates that were to be found in magazines and journals, but they were characterized by a different, sociological perspective, which took account of the transformations in social structure and in culture, and of the achievements of the rapidly developing sub-discipline of sociology, namely the sociology of education.
本文探讨两次世界大战之间(1918 - 1939年)波兰知识分子的问题。在引言中,作者介绍了研究这一问题可采用的各种方法,这些方法侧重于从社会结构的角度分析该社会阶层的社会意识及其转变。在论文的后续部分,作者通过对该时期特写文章的分析,指出了那个时期波兰知识分子的形象,即知识分子的自我认知形象,以及两次世界大战之间时期历史学家著作中所揭示的形象。最后,在论文的主要部分,作者介绍了四位在两次世界大战之间生活和工作、研究波兰知识分子问题的社会学家的观点:弗洛里安·兹南涅茨基(1882 - 1958)、亚历山大·赫茨(1895 - 1983)、斯坦尼斯瓦夫·雷赫林斯基(1903 - 1944)和约瑟夫·查拉斯尼斯基(1904 - 1979)。将这些社会学家们的观点与记者和历史学家的观点并列比较,以审视这些观点的价值和原创性。还结合该时期社会学的发展、相关社会学家的研究领域和兴趣以及他们所遵循的理论框架,对他们关于知识分子的观点进行分析。社会学家们对知识分子的研究可被视为更广泛的文化变迁研究(兹南涅茨基、赫茨)和社会结构变迁研究(雷赫林斯基、查拉斯尼斯基)的一部分。所有四位社会学家都指出了波兰知识分子所经历的变化以及其发挥领导作用所涉及的问题。除了查拉斯尼斯基之外,这些社会学家都赞赏知识分子在波兰社会中的积极作用,并指出有必要采取措施重建进入社会精英阶层的晋升途径,他们认为教育机构在这方面发挥着重要作用。社会晋升问题,尤其是关于社会精英的讨论,与当时杂志和期刊上的辩论相契合,但这些讨论具有不同的社会学视角,考虑到了社会结构和文化的转变以及迅速发展的社会学子学科即教育社会学的成果。
Kwart Hist Nauki Tech. 2007
Sociol Health Illn. 2003
Psychiatr Prax. 2004-11