Suppr超能文献

对比增强磁共振成像与核成像在评估心肌存活性方面的一致性与差异性

Agreement and disagreement between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear imaging for assessment of myocardial viability.

作者信息

Roes Stijntje D, Kaandorp Theodorus A M, Marsan Nina Ajmone, Westenberg Jos J M, Dibbets-Schneider Petra, Stokkel Marcel P, Lamb Hildo J, van der Wall Ernst E, de Roos Albert, Bax Jeroen J

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Apr;36(4):594-601. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-1001-0. Epub 2008 Dec 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced MRI and nuclear imaging with (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for assessment of myocardial viability.

METHODS

Included in the study were 60 patients with severe ischaemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI, (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin and (18)F-FDG SPECT. Myocardial segments were assigned a wall motion score from 0 (normokinesia) to 4 (dyskinesia) and a scar score from 0 (no scar) to 4 (76-100% transmural extent). Furthermore, (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin and (18)F-FDG segmental tracer uptake was categorized from 0 (tracer activity >75%) to 3 (tracer activity <25%). Dysfunctional segments were classified into viability patterns on SPECT: normal perfusion/(18)F-FDG uptake, perfusion/(18)F-FDG mismatch, and mild or severe perfusion/(18)F-FDG match.

RESULTS

Minimal scar tissue was observed on contrast-enhanced MRI (scar score 0.4+/-0.8) in segments with normal perfusion/(18)F-FDG uptake, whereas extensive scar tissue (scar score 3.1+/-1.0) was noted in segments with severe perfusion/(18)F-FDG match (p < 0.001). High agreement (91%) for viability assessment between contrast-enhanced MRI and nuclear imaging was observed in segments without scar tissue on contrast-enhanced MRI as well as in segments with transmural scar tissue (83%). Of interest, disagreement was observed in segments with subendocardial scar tissue on contrast-enhanced MRI.

CONCLUSION

Agreement between contrast-enhanced MRI and nuclear imaging for assessment of viability was high in segments without scar tissue and in segments with transmural scar tissue on contrast-enhanced MRI. However, evident disagreement was observed in segments with subendocardial scar tissue on contrast-enhanced MRI, illustrating that the nonenhanced epicardial rim can contain either normal or ischaemically jeopardized myocardium.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较对比增强磁共振成像(MRI)与核成像,即使用锝-99m 四磷酰胺(99mTc- tetrofosmin)和氟-18 脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)来评估心肌活力。

方法

本研究纳入了 60 例患有严重缺血性左心室(LV)功能障碍的患者,他们接受了对比增强 MRI、99mTc-四磷酰胺和 18F-FDG SPECT 检查。心肌节段被赋予一个壁运动评分,范围从 0(正常运动)到 4(运动障碍),以及一个瘢痕评分,范围从 0(无瘢痕)到 4(透壁范围 76%-100%)。此外,99mTc-四磷酰胺和 18F-FDG 节段性示踪剂摄取被分为 0(示踪剂活性>75%)到 3(示踪剂活性<25%)。功能失调的节段在 SPECT 上被分类为存活模式:正常灌注/18F-FDG 摄取、灌注/18F-FDG 不匹配以及轻度或重度灌注/18F-FDG 匹配。

结果

在灌注正常/18F-FDG 摄取的节段中,对比增强 MRI 观察到最小的瘢痕组织(瘢痕评分 0.4±0.8),而在重度灌注/18F-FDG 匹配的节段中发现广泛的瘢痕组织(瘢痕评分 3.1±1.0)(p<0.001)。在对比增强 MRI 上无瘢痕组织的节段以及有透壁瘢痕组织的节段中,对比增强 MRI 与核成像之间的存活评估一致性较高(91%)。有趣的是,在对比增强 MRI 上有心内膜下瘢痕组织的节段中观察到不一致。

结论

在对比增强 MRI 上无瘢痕组织的节段以及有透壁瘢痕组织的节段中,对比增强 MRI 与核成像在存活评估方面的一致性较高。然而,在对比增强 MRI 上有心内膜下瘢痕组织的节段中观察到明显的不一致,这表明未增强的心外膜边缘可能包含正常或缺血受损的心肌。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验