Suppr超能文献

IA类、B类和C类抗心律失常药物与胺碘酮联合应用于可诱导的持续性室性心动过速患者的前瞻性比较。

A prospective comparison of class IA, B, and C antiarrhythmic agents in combination with amiodarone in patients with inducible, sustained ventricular tachycardia.

作者信息

Toivonen L, Kadish A, Morady F

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

Circulation. 1991 Jul;84(1):101-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.84.1.101.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical experience suggests that combinations of antiarrhythmic agents provide more effective control of ventricular tachyarrhythmias than does therapy with single agents.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Antiarrhythmic and electrophysiological effects of three class I antiarrhythmic agents, one from each subclass A, B, and C, were assessed in single use and in combination with amiodarone in patients with inducible, sustained ventricular tachycardia that was not suppressed by monotherapy with these agents. Thirty-one patients underwent an electrophysiology test on four occasions: at baseline; after 2-4 days of treatment with quinidine, mexiletine, or encainide; after 2 weeks of treatment with 1,200 mg/day amiodarone; and last, after 2-4 days of treatment with both amiodarone and the previously tested class I agent. The combination of a class I agent and amiodarone prevented the induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia in only one of 31 (3%) patients. Ventricular tachycardia became hemodynamically stable in 11 of 31 (34%) patients because of a marked prolongation in the tachycardia cycle length. It increased from 323 +/- 39 to 423 +/- 84 msec (n = 11, p less than 0.01) by adding encainide to amiodarone therapy, and it showed a tendency to lengthen when quinidine was added to amiodarone (from 373 +/- 77 to 425 +/- 58 msec; n = 10, NS). Each class I agent increased amiodarone-induced depression in myocardial conduction, but the extent of the additional depression seemed to differ among the three subclasses. Ventricular refractoriness was increased by all class I agents when used in combination with amiodarone, although not by mexiletine or encainide when used alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Class I antiarrhythmic agents slow ventricular conduction and increase ventricular refractoriness when used in combination with amiodarone. When amiodarone and class I drugs by themselves do not suppress the induction of ventricular tachycardia, the combination of amiodarone and a class I agent seldom results in noninducibility; however, it often lengthens the ventricular tachycardia cycle length and may render the ventricular tachycardia hemodynamically stable.

摘要

背景

临床经验表明,与单一抗心律失常药物治疗相比,联合使用抗心律失常药物能更有效地控制室性快速心律失常。

方法与结果

在不能被这些药物单药治疗抑制的可诱导持续性室性心动过速患者中,评估了三种I类抗心律失常药物(分别来自A、B、C三个亚类各一种)单独使用以及与胺碘酮联合使用时的抗心律失常和电生理效应。31例患者接受了4次电生理检查:基线时;在用奎尼丁、美西律或恩卡胺治疗2 - 4天后;在用1200mg/天胺碘酮治疗2周后;最后,在用胺碘酮和先前检测的I类药物联合治疗2 - 4天后。I类药物与胺碘酮联合使用仅在31例患者中的1例(3%)中预防了持续性室性心动过速的诱发。31例患者中有11例(34%)的室性心动过速因心动过速周期长度显著延长而血流动力学变得稳定。通过在胺碘酮治疗中加用恩卡胺,心动过速周期长度从323±39毫秒增加到423±84毫秒(n = 11,p < 0.01),当在胺碘酮中加用奎尼丁时心动过速周期长度有延长趋势(从373±77毫秒到425±58毫秒;n = 10,无显著性差异)。每种I类药物均增加了胺碘酮所致的心肌传导抑制,但三个亚类之间额外抑制的程度似乎有所不同。当与胺碘酮联合使用时,所有I类药物均增加了心室不应期,尽管美西律或恩卡胺单独使用时未增加。

结论

I类抗心律失常药物与胺碘酮联合使用时可减慢心室传导并增加心室不应期。当胺碘酮和I类药物单独使用不能抑制室性心动过速的诱发时,胺碘酮与I类药物联合使用很少能使室性心动过速不被诱发;然而,它常常延长室性心动过速周期长度并可能使室性心动过速血流动力学稳定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验