Ball Lonnele J, Levy Nitzan, Zhao Xiaoyue, Griffin Chandi, Tagliaferri Mary, Cohen Isaac, Ricke William A, Speed Terence P, Firestone Gary L, Leitman Dale C
Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009 Feb 27;299(2):204-11. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.10.050. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), such as tamoxifen and raloxifene can act as estrogen receptor (ER) antagonists or agonists depending on the cell type. The antagonistic action of tamoxifen has been invaluable for treating breast cancer, whereas the agonist activity of SERMs also has important clinical applications as demonstrated by the use of raloxifene for osteoporosis. Whereas the mechanism whereby SERMs function as antagonists has been studied extensively very little is known about how SERMs produce agonist effects in different tissues with the two ER types; ERalpha and ERbeta. We examined the regulation of 32 SERM-responsive regions with ERalpha and ERbeta in transiently transfected MCF-7 breast, Ishikawa endometrial, HeLa cervical and WAR-5 prostate cancer cells. The regions were regulated by tamoxifen and raloxifene in some cell types, but not in all cell lines. Tamoxifen activated similar number of regions with ERalpha and ERbeta in the cell lines, whereas raloxifene activated over twice as many regions with ERbeta compared to ERalpha. In Ishikawa endometrial cancer cells, tamoxifen activated 17 regions with ERalpha, whereas raloxifene activated only 2 regions, which might explain their different effects on the endometrium. Microarray studies also found that raloxifene regulated fewer genes than tamoxifen in U2OS bone cancer cells expressing ERalpha, whereas tamoxifen was equally effective at regulating genes with ERalpha and ERbeta. Our studies indicate that tamoxifen is a non-selective agonist, whereas raloxifene is a relative ERbeta-selective agonist, and suggest that ERbeta-selective SERMs might be safer for treating clinical conditions that are dependent on the agonist property of SERMs.
选择性雌激素受体调节剂(SERM),如他莫昔芬和雷洛昔芬,根据细胞类型可作为雌激素受体(ER)拮抗剂或激动剂。他莫昔芬的拮抗作用在治疗乳腺癌方面具有重要价值,而SERM的激动剂活性也具有重要的临床应用,如雷洛昔芬用于治疗骨质疏松症所证明的那样。虽然SERM作为拮抗剂发挥作用的机制已得到广泛研究,但对于SERM如何在具有两种ER类型(ERα和ERβ)的不同组织中产生激动剂效应却知之甚少。我们在瞬时转染的MCF-7乳腺癌细胞、石川子宫内膜癌细胞、HeLa宫颈癌细胞和WAR-5前列腺癌细胞中,研究了32个SERM反应区域受ERα和ERβ的调控情况。这些区域在某些细胞类型中受他莫昔芬和雷洛昔芬调控,但并非在所有细胞系中都如此。在细胞系中,他莫昔芬激活的ERα和ERβ反应区域数量相似,而雷洛昔芬激活的ERβ反应区域数量是ERα的两倍多。在石川子宫内膜癌细胞中,他莫昔芬激活了17个ERα反应区域,而雷洛昔芬仅激活了2个区域,这可能解释了它们对子宫内膜的不同作用。微阵列研究还发现,在表达ERα的U2OS骨肉瘤细胞中,雷洛昔芬调控的基因比他莫昔芬少,而他莫昔芬对ERα和ERβ调控基因的效果相同。我们的研究表明,他莫昔芬是一种非选择性激动剂,而雷洛昔芬是一种相对ERβ选择性激动剂,并提示ERβ选择性SERM在治疗依赖SERM激动剂特性的临床疾病时可能更安全。