Suppr超能文献

[关于促性腺激素释放激素(LH-RH)激动剂长效制剂TAP-144-SR用于前列腺癌患者的临床III期研究]

[Clinical phase III study on TAP-144-SR, an LH-RH agonist depot formulation, in patients with prostatic cancer].

作者信息

Aso Y, Kameyama S, Niijima T, Ohmori H, Ohashi T, Murahashi I, Akimoto M, Koiso K, Akaza H, Hosaka M

机构信息

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo.

出版信息

Hinyokika Kiyo. 1991 Mar;37(3):305-20.

PMID:1906239
Abstract

A randomized controlled phase III clinical trial comparing TAP-144-SR (TAP) and diethylstilbestrol diphosphate was conducted for patients with prostatic cancer. Patients with Stage B, C, or D disease, who were previously untreated, were enrolled. TAP-144-SR 3.75 mg was administered subcutaneously at 4-week intervals for 12 weeks (a total of 3 injections) in the TAP-144-SR group, while 100 mg of diethylstilbestrol diphosphate was administered orally three times a day (before meals) for 12 weeks in the control group. A total of 141 patients were enrolled using a centralized telephone registration system. Four of these patients were ineligible, and there were 3 drop-outs who never received drugs because they withdrew their consents to participate in the trial. These 7 were excluded from the evaluation, and as a result, 134 patients (66 in the TAP group and 68 in the control group) were evaluable in safety and efficacy. Between the two groups, there were no significant differences in patient characteristics, except the age distribution. Clinical response rates (CR+PR) in evaluable patients according to the criteria of Japanese Prostatic Cancer Study Group were 54.5% in the TAP group and 47.1% in the control group. In addition, the rates according to the criteria for Evaluating the Direct Response to Chemotherapy in Solid Carcinomas and NPCP criteria were 7.6% in the TAP group and 8.8% in the control group and 18.2% in the TAP group and 20.6% in the control group, respectively. Using any of the three criteria, there were no significant differences in response rate between the two groups. The incidence of side effects was 64.1% in the TAP group and 95.4% in the control group; the incidence being significantly higher in the control group (p less than 0.001; chi 2-test). Therefore, the overall safety was significantly greater in the TAP group than in the control group (p less than 0.001; chi 2-test). On the basis of the efficacy and safety the clinical usefulness rate of TAP-144-SR was significantly higher than that of diethylstilbestrol diphosphate (p = 0.038; U-test). In conclusion, TAP-144-SR was confirmed to be more useful than diethylstilbestrol diphosphate as a standard drug for hormonal therapy of prostatic cancer.

摘要

一项针对前列腺癌患者的随机对照III期临床试验,比较了TAP - 144 - SR(TAP)与己烯雌酚二磷酸酯。招募了之前未接受过治疗的B、C或D期疾病患者。TAP - 144 - SR组每4周皮下注射3.75 mg,共注射12周(共3次);对照组则口服100 mg己烯雌酚二磷酸酯,每日3次(饭前),共服用12周。使用集中式电话登记系统共招募了141名患者。其中4名患者不符合条件,有3名退出者因撤回参与试验的同意书而从未接受药物治疗。这7名患者被排除在评估之外,因此,134名患者(TAP组66名,对照组68名)可进行安全性和疗效评估。两组之间,除年龄分布外,患者特征无显著差异。根据日本前列腺癌研究组标准,可评估患者的临床缓解率(CR + PR)在TAP组为54.5%,对照组为47.1%。此外,根据实体癌化疗直接反应评估标准和NPCP标准,TAP组分别为7.6%和18.2%,对照组分别为8.8%和20.6%。使用这三种标准中的任何一种,两组之间的缓解率均无显著差异。TAP组副作用发生率为64.1%,对照组为95.4%;对照组发生率显著更高(p小于0.001;卡方检验)。因此,TAP组的总体安全性显著高于对照组(p小于0.001;卡方检验)。基于疗效和安全性,TAP - 144 - SR的临床有用率显著高于己烯雌酚二磷酸酯(p = 0.038;U检验)。总之,TAP - 144 - SR被证实作为前列腺癌激素治疗的标准药物比己烯雌酚二磷酸酯更有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验