• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估先天性和小儿心脏病患者治疗结果的数据库——心脏外科视角

Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease--the perspective of cardiac surgery.

作者信息

Jacobs Marshall Lewis, Jacobs Jeffrey Phillip, Franklin Rodney C G, Mavroudis Constantine, Lacour-Gayet Francois, Tchervenkov Christo I, Walters Hal, Bacha Emile A, Clarke David Robinson, William Gaynor J, Spray Thomas L, Stellin Giovanni, Ebels Tjark, Maruszewski Bohdan, Tobota Zdzislaw, Kurosawa Hiromi, Elliott Martin

机构信息

Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19073, USA.

出版信息

Cardiol Young. 2008 Dec;18 Suppl 2:101-15. doi: 10.1017/S1047951108002813.

DOI:10.1017/S1047951108002813
PMID:19063780
Abstract

This review includes a brief discussion, from the perspective of cardiac surgeons, of the rationale for creation and maintenance of multi-institutional databases of outcomes of congenital heart surgery, together with a history of the evolution of such databases, a description of the current state of the art, and a discussion of areas for improvement and future expansion of the concept. Five fundamental areas are reviewed: nomenclature, mechanism of data collection and storage, mechanisms for the evaluation and comparison of the complexity of operations and stratification of risk, mechanisms to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the data, and mechanisms for expansion of the current capabilities of databases to include comparison and sharing of data between medical subspecialties. This review briefly describes several European and North American initiatives related to databases for pediatric and congenital cardiac surgery the Congenital Database of The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, the Congenital Database of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium, and the Central Cardiac Audit Database in the United Kingdom. Potential means of approaching the ultimate goal of acquisition of long-term follow-up data, and input of this data over the life of the patient, are also considered.

摘要

本综述从心脏外科医生的角度,简要讨论了建立和维护先天性心脏手术多机构结局数据库的基本原理,以及此类数据库的发展历程、当前技术水平描述,还讨论了改进领域和该概念未来的扩展方向。回顾了五个基本领域:命名法、数据收集和存储机制、手术复杂性评估与比较及风险分层机制、确保数据完整性和准确性的机制,以及扩展数据库当前功能以纳入医学亚专业之间数据比较和共享的机制。本综述简要介绍了欧洲和北美的几项与小儿及先天性心脏手术数据库相关的计划,即欧洲心胸外科学会先天性数据库、胸外科医师学会先天性数据库、小儿心脏护理联盟,以及英国的中央心脏审计数据库。还考虑了实现获取长期随访数据这一最终目标的潜在方法,以及在患者的整个生命周期内输入此类数据的方法。

相似文献

1
Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease--the perspective of cardiac surgery.评估先天性和小儿心脏病患者治疗结果的数据库——心脏外科视角
Cardiol Young. 2008 Dec;18 Suppl 2:101-15. doi: 10.1017/S1047951108002813.
2
Nomenclature and databases for the surgical treatment of congenital cardiac disease--an updated primer and an analysis of opportunities for improvement.先天性心脏病外科治疗的命名法与数据库——最新入门指南及改进机会分析
Cardiol Young. 2008 Dec;18 Suppl 2:38-62. doi: 10.1017/S1047951108003028.
3
Analysis of outcomes for congenital cardiac disease: can we do better?先天性心脏病治疗结果分析:我们能否做得更好?
Cardiol Young. 2007 Sep;17 Suppl 2:145-58. doi: 10.1017/S1047951107001278.
4
Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease--the perspective of cardiology.评估先天性和小儿心脏病患者治疗结果的数据库——心脏病学视角
Cardiol Young. 2008 Dec;18 Suppl 2:116-23. doi: 10.1017/S1047951108002825.
5
Verification of data in congenital cardiac surgery.先天性心脏手术中数据的验证。
Cardiol Young. 2008 Dec;18 Suppl 2:177-87. doi: 10.1017/S1047951108002862.
6
Congenital heart surgery databases around the world: do we need a global database?世界各地的先天性心脏病手术数据库:我们需要一个全球数据库吗?
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2010;13(1):3-19. doi: 10.1053/j.pcsu.2010.02.003.
7
Stratification of complexity: the Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 method and the Aristotle Complexity Score--past, present, and future.复杂性分层:先天性心脏病手术风险调整-1方法与亚里士多德复杂性评分——过去、现在与未来
Cardiol Young. 2008 Dec;18 Suppl 2:163-8. doi: 10.1017/S1047951108002904.
8
Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease--the perspective of anaesthesia.评估先天性和小儿心脏病患者治疗结果的数据库——麻醉学视角
Cardiol Young. 2008 Dec;18 Suppl 2:124-9. doi: 10.1017/S1047951108002874.
9
Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease--the perspective of critical care.评估先天性和小儿心脏病患者治疗结果的数据库——重症监护视角
Cardiol Young. 2008 Dec;18 Suppl 2:130-6. doi: 10.1017/S1047951108002886.
10
Nomenclature for congenital and paediatric cardiac disease: historical perspectives and The International Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code.先天性和儿科心脏病的命名法:历史视角与《国际儿科和先天性心脏病编码》
Cardiol Young. 2008 Dec;18 Suppl 2:70-80. doi: 10.1017/S1047951108002795.

引用本文的文献

1
Combining Congenital Heart Surgical and Interventional Cardiology Outcome Data in a Single Database: The Development of a Patient-Centered Collaboration of the European Congenital Heart Surgeons Association (ECHSA) and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC).将先天性心脏病外科和介入心脏病学的结果数据合并到一个单一数据库中:欧洲先天性心脏病外科医生协会 (ECHSA) 和欧洲儿科和先天性心脏病协会 (AEPC) 的以患者为中心的合作的发展。
World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2023 Jul;14(4):464-473. doi: 10.1177/21501351231168829.
2
Health Care Policy and Congenital Heart Disease: 2020 Focus on Our 2030 Future.医疗保健政策与先天性心脏病:2020 聚焦我们的 2030 未来。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Oct 19;10(20):e020605. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020605. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
3
Pediatric Intensive Care Databases for Quality Improvement.用于质量改进的儿科重症监护数据库。
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2016 Sep;5(3):81-88. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1568146. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
4
What are the essential features of a successful surgical registry? a systematic review.成功的外科手术注册研究的基本特征有哪些?一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 24;7(9):e017373. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017373.
5
Selection by a panel of clinicians and family representatives of important early morbidities associated with paediatric cardiac surgery suitable for routine monitoring using the nominal group technique and a robust voting process.由一组临床医生和家庭代表通过名义群体技术和严格的投票程序,挑选出适合常规监测的与小儿心脏手术相关的重要早期发病情况。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 29;7(5):e014743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014743.
6
Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group: An Integrated Network for Congenital Heart Disease Research.美国国立心肺血液研究所工作组报告:先天性心脏病研究综合网络
Circulation. 2016 Apr 5;133(14):1410-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019506.
7
CHD associated with syndromic diagnoses: peri-operative risk factors and early outcomes.与综合征诊断相关的冠心病:围手术期危险因素及早期结局
Cardiol Young. 2016 Jan;26(1):30-52. doi: 10.1017/S1047951115001389. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
8
Measuring hospital performance in congenital heart surgery: administrative versus clinical registry data.衡量先天性心脏病手术中的医院绩效:行政数据与临床登记数据对比
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Mar;99(3):932-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.10.069. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
9
Accuracy of the all patient refined diagnosis related groups classification system in congenital heart surgery.全患者精细化诊断相关分组分类系统在先天性心脏病外科中的准确性。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb;97(2):641-50. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
10
Public health science agenda for congenital heart defects: report from a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention experts meeting.先天性心脏病的公共卫生科学议程:疾病控制与预防中心专家会议报告
J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Aug 28;2(5):e000256. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000256.