Kumar Santosh, Udgaonkar Jayant B
National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560 065, India.
J Mol Biol. 2009 Jan 30;385(4):1266-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.11.033. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
A major goal in the study of protein aggregation is to understand how the conformational heterogeneity characteristic of the process leads to structurally distinct amyloid fibrils. The small protein barstar is known to form amyloid protofibrils in multiple steps at low pH: a small oligomer, the A-form, first transforms into a larger spherical higher oligomeric intermediate (HOI), which then self-associates to form the elongated protofibril. To determine how the conformational conversion reaction during aggregation is coupled to the process of protofibril formation, cysteine-scanning mutagenesis was first used to identify specific residue positions in the protein sequence, which are important in defining the nature of the aggregation process. Two classes of mutant proteins, which are distinguished by their kinetics of aggregation at high protein concentration, have been identified: Class I mutant proteins undergo conformational conversion, as measured by an increase in thioflavin T binding ability and an increase in circular dichroism at 216 nm, significantly faster than Class II mutant proteins. At low protein concentration, the rates of conformational conversion are, however, identical for both classes of mutant proteins. At high protein concentration, the two classes of mutant proteins can be further distinguished on the basis of their rates of protofibril growth, as determined from dynamic light-scattering measurements. For Class I mutant proteins, protofibril elongation occurs at the same, or slightly faster, rate than conformational conversion. For Class II mutant proteins, protofibril elongation is significantly slower than conformational conversion. Dynamic light scattering measurements and atomic force microscopy imaging indicate that for the Class I mutant proteins, conformational conversion occurs concurrently with the self-association of prefibrillar HOIs into protofibrils. On the other hand, for the Class II mutant proteins, the prefibrillar HOI first undergoes conformational conversion, and the conformationally converted HOIs then self-associate to form protofibrils. The two classes of mutant proteins appear, therefore, to use structurally distinct pathways to form amyloid protofibrils. On one pathway, conformational conversion occurs along with, or after, elongation of the oligomers; on the other pathway, conformational conversion precedes elongation of the oligomers. Single mutations in the protein can cause aggregation to switch from one pathway to the other. Importantly, the protofibrils formed by the two classes of mutant proteins have significantly different diameters and different internal structures.
蛋白质聚集研究中的一个主要目标是了解该过程的构象异质性特征如何导致结构不同的淀粉样原纤维。已知小蛋白巴氏杆菌在低pH值下分多个步骤形成淀粉样原纤维:一种小寡聚体,即A形式,首先转变为更大的球形高级寡聚中间体(HOI),然后该中间体自组装形成细长的原纤维。为了确定聚集过程中的构象转化反应如何与原纤维形成过程相耦合,首先使用半胱氨酸扫描诱变来确定蛋白质序列中的特定残基位置,这些位置对于定义聚集过程的性质很重要。已鉴定出两类突变蛋白,它们在高蛋白浓度下的聚集动力学有所不同:I类突变蛋白发生构象转化,通过硫黄素T结合能力的增加和216nm处圆二色性的增加来衡量,其速度明显快于II类突变蛋白。然而,在低蛋白浓度下,两类突变蛋白的构象转化速率相同。在高蛋白浓度下,根据动态光散射测量确定的原纤维生长速率,可进一步区分这两类突变蛋白。对于I类突变蛋白,原纤维伸长的速率与构象转化相同或略快。对于II类突变蛋白,原纤维伸长明显慢于构象转化。动态光散射测量和原子力显微镜成像表明,对于I类突变蛋白,构象转化与原纤维前体HOI自组装成原纤维同时发生。另一方面,对于II类突变蛋白,原纤维前体HOI首先发生构象转化,然后构象转化的HOI自组装形成原纤维。因此,这两类突变蛋白似乎使用结构不同的途径来形成淀粉样原纤维。在一条途径中,构象转化与寡聚体伸长同时发生或在其之后发生;在另一条途径中,构象转化先于寡聚体伸长。蛋白质中的单个突变可导致聚集从一条途径切换到另一条途径。重要的是,由这两类突变蛋白形成的原纤维具有明显不同的直径和不同的内部结构。