Kelechi Teresa J, Neal Diane E
College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2008 Dec;21(12):576-81. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000323590.65723.10.
To examine whether a patient group with chronic venous disorders (CVDs) would show a different response to a pressure provocation test, such as skin perfusion pressure (SPP) of microcirculatory function.
A cuff inflation technique was applied to the gaiter area of the lower legs to induce complete occlusion of the microcirculation. The cuff was then released to measure the pressure at which perfusion resumed, and SPP was measured with a laser Doppler flowmeter (LDF). The measurements at reperfusion were taken of skin of the lower legs of individuals with CVD and compared with the lower-leg skin of control participants.
To establish whether a measurable difference in SPP exists between the group with CVD and the group without CVD, the means of 9 measurements taken were compared using the Student t test. The lowest value of the 9 measurements of minimum pressure (LMV) was used to estimate the pressure at which reperfusion occurred (SPP). The means of those estimates were then compared using the Student t test.
The mean LMV measured in the CVD group was slightly higher than that measured in the group without CVD. Although this could be considered a clinically significant result, it was not statistically different.
For this study, SPP was not significantly different for those with CVD compared with those without. These results suggest that SPP conducted with an LDF has little potential to detect "invisible" changes in the microcirculatory function of the skin affected by CVDs.
研究患有慢性静脉疾病(CVD)的患者组对压力激发试验(如微循环的皮肤灌注压[SPP])是否会表现出不同反应。
采用袖带充气技术作用于小腿的袜套区,以诱导微循环完全闭塞。然后松开袖带,测量灌注恢复时的压力,并用激光多普勒血流仪(LDF)测量SPP。对患有CVD的个体小腿皮肤在再灌注时进行测量,并与对照参与者的小腿皮肤进行比较。
为确定患有CVD的组与未患CVD的组之间在SPP上是否存在可测量的差异,使用学生t检验比较9次测量的平均值。9次最小压力测量值(LMV)中的最低值用于估计再灌注发生时的压力(SPP)。然后使用学生t检验比较这些估计值的平均值。
CVD组测量的平均LMV略高于未患CVD组测量的平均LMV。虽然这可被视为具有临床意义的结果,但在统计学上并无差异。
在本研究中,患有CVD者与未患CVD者的SPP无显著差异。这些结果表明,用LDF进行的SPP检测受CVD影响的皮肤微循环功能“不可见”变化的潜力很小。