Restenosis begets restenosis: implications for stent selection.

BACKGROUND

Identifying the risk for restenosis is of critical importance in the stent selection process of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, we sought to determine if a history of clinical recurrence (CR) after PCI increases the risk of CR after treatment of a de novo lesion in another coronary artery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed all 12,763 patients who underwent PCI between 1993 and 2004 and selected patients with two or more interventions in two different native vessels. These patients were divided into two groups: patients without CR, and patients with CR after the first PCI. Clinical recurrence was defined as revascular-isation of the target vessel by either PCI or CABG within one year.

RESULTS

A total of 1010 patients with two or more interventions in two different native vessels were identified: 727 patients without and 283 patients with CR after the first PCI. Baseline patient characteristics and conventional risk factors were comparable between the two groups. Patients with a history of CR had a higher risk of CR after a second intervention in a second vessel (OR=3.4, 95% CI=2.3 to 4.9). A total of 112 patients also had a third intervention in a third native vessel: 12 patients with two CR, 30 patients with one CR and 70 patients with no CR after the first two interventions. CR rates in these patients were 50, 17 and 3%, respectively (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a history of CR have a markedly increased risk of developing CR after a second or third PCI in a different coronary artery. Therefore, in the decision-making process on whether to use a bare metal stent or drug-eluting stent, the history of CR is a simple and powerful aid. (Neth Heart J 2008;16:376-81.).