van Nispen Ruth M A, de Boer Michiel R, van Rens Ger H M B
Department of Ophthalmology, EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Qual Life Res. 2009 Feb;18(1):65-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9425-3. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
To present psychometric information and studies dealing with questionnaires for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and visually impaired patients in addition to the study by Finger et al. "Quality of life in AMD: a review of available vision-specific psychometric tools". We propose that their literature search should not have focused solely on the specific eye disease AMD.
The literature search was partly replicated (PubMed) by using "visual impairment" instead of "macular degeneration" as free text words. Psychometric information was obtained from the additional studies. Preliminary results from a differential item functioning (DIF) analysis used to examine the relationship between item responses on the Vision-related quality of life Core Measure (VCM1) of AMD patients versus patients with other eye conditions are discussed.
Eight studies of visually impaired patient populations, including AMD patients, are discussed, with psychometric information from six vision-specific questionnaires. The VCM1 items did not present DIF, which means that the items were equally interpreted by all patients.
The results on DIF and the additional studies presented here confirm that a specific eye disorder is of minor importance in the choice of a vision-specific questionnaire or, in this case, a literature search.
除了芬格等人的研究“年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的生活质量:现有视力特异性心理测量工具综述”之外,还展示关于AMD和视力受损患者问卷的心理测量信息及研究。我们认为他们的文献检索不应仅聚焦于特定眼病AMD。
通过使用“视力损害”而非“黄斑变性”作为自由文本词,部分重复了文献检索(PubMed)。从其他研究中获取心理测量信息。讨论了用于检查AMD患者与其他眼部疾病患者在视力相关生活质量核心量表(VCM1)上的项目反应之间关系的差异项目功能(DIF)分析的初步结果。
讨论了八项针对包括AMD患者在内的视力受损患者群体的研究,以及来自六种视力特异性问卷的心理测量信息。VCM1项目未呈现差异项目功能,这意味着所有患者对这些项目的理解相同。
这里呈现的差异项目功能结果及其他研究证实,在选择视力特异性问卷或在此例中的文献检索时,特定眼病的重要性较小。