腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆漏:支架置入时机还是引流时机。

Biliary leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: time to stent or time to drain.

作者信息

Pinkas Haim, Brady Patrick G

机构信息

Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.

出版信息

Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2008 Dec;7(6):628-32.

DOI:
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-creatography (ERCP) with placement of a biliary stent or nasobiliary (NB) drain is the procedure of choice for treatment of post-cholecystectomy bile duct leaks. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of NB drainage versus internal biliary stenting on rates of leak closure, time elapsed until drain or stent removal, length of hospital stay and number of required endoscopic procedures.

METHODS

Charts were reviewed on 20 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy complicated by Luschka or cystic duct leak. Ten patients were treated with NB drains connected to low intermittent suction and repeat NB cholangiograms were performed until leak closure was observed. Ten patients were treated with internal biliary stents. Biliary sphincterotomies were performed for stone extraction or a presumed papillary stenosis. Large bilomas were drained percutaneously prior to stenting.

RESULTS

In all 20 patients, a cholangiogram and successful placement of a NB drain or internal stent was achieved. Four patients (20%) were found to have bile duct stones, which were extracted following a sphincterotomy. Sixteen patients required percutaneous drains to evacuate large bilomas prior to biliary instrumentation. Fifteen cystic duct leaks and 5 Luschka duct leaks were reviewed. There were no complications related to ERCP. Closure of the leak was documented within 2 to 11 days (mean 4.7+/-0.9 days) in patients receiving a NB drain. The drains were removed non-endoscopically following leak closure. The internal stent group required stenting for 14 to 53 days (mean 29.1+/-4.4 days). The stent was then removed endoscopically after documentation of leak closure. Bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy closed rapidly after NB drainage and did not require repeat endoscopy for removal of the NB drain, resulting in fewer ERCPs required for treatment of biliary leaks. Internal biliary stents were in place longer owing to the nature of this intermittent endoscopic approach but an accurate comparison of time to leak closure could not be determined. Leak closure resulted once the bile flow was re-established, regardless of the technique, but removal of the NB drains was performed earlier than removal of the biliary stents. The number of ERCPs required per patient was 1.0+/-0 in the NB group and 2.2+/-0.1 (range 2-3) in the internal stent group. The length of hospitalization was 8.7+/-3.3 days for the NB group and 7.5+/-2.3 days for the internal stent group. Biliary stent placement resulted in an insignificant decrease in hospitalization at the expense of generating twice as many endoscopic procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that NB drainage may be advantageous in patients requiring a prolonged hospital admission or in patients in whom repeat endoscopy is undesirable. Internal biliary stenting appears preferable when early discharge is anticipated or when expertise in placement and management of NB drains is lacking.

摘要

背景

内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)联合放置胆管支架或鼻胆管(NB)引流管是治疗胆囊切除术后胆管漏的首选方法。本研究的目的是比较NB引流与胆管内支架置入术在漏口闭合率、引流管或支架拔除前的时间、住院时间以及所需内镜操作次数方面的效果。

方法

回顾了20例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术并发卢氏管或胆囊管漏的患者的病历。10例患者采用连接低间歇性吸引的NB引流管治疗,并重复进行NB胆管造影,直至观察到漏口闭合。10例患者采用胆管内支架治疗。为取出结石或推测存在乳头狭窄而行胆管括约肌切开术。在置入支架前,经皮引流巨大胆汁瘤。

结果

所有20例患者均成功进行了胆管造影并成功置入了NB引流管或内支架。4例(20%)患者发现有胆管结石,在括约肌切开术后取出。16例患者在进行胆管器械操作前需要经皮引流以排出巨大胆汁瘤。回顾了15例胆囊管漏和5例卢氏管漏。未发生与ERCP相关的并发症。接受NB引流的患者在2至11天内(平均4.7±0.9天)记录到漏口闭合。漏口闭合后,非内镜方式拔除引流管。内支架组需要置入支架14至53天(平均29.1±4.4天)。在记录到漏口闭合后,通过内镜取出支架。腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的胆漏在NB引流后迅速闭合,且无需重复内镜检查来拔除NB引流管,从而减少了治疗胆漏所需的ERCP次数。由于这种间歇性内镜方法的性质,胆管内支架留置时间更长,但无法准确比较漏口闭合时间。无论采用何种技术,一旦胆汁流动恢复,漏口即闭合,但NB引流管的拔除早于胆管支架。NB组每位患者所需的ERCP次数为1.0±0次,内支架组为2.2±0.1次(范围2 - 3次)。NB组住院时间为8.7±3.3天,内支架组为7.5±2.3天。胆管支架置入术虽使住院时间略有缩短,但代价是内镜操作次数增加了一倍。

结论

我们的数据表明,对于需要延长住院时间或不希望重复内镜检查的患者,NB引流可能具有优势。当预期早期出院或缺乏NB引流管置入和管理专业知识时,胆管内支架置入术似乎更可取。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索