Ljubičić Neven, Bišćanin Alen, Pavić Tajana, Nikolić Marko, Budimir Ivan, Mijić August, Đuzel Ana
Neven Ljubičić, Alen Bišćanin, Tajana Pavić, Marko Nikolić, Ivan Budimir, Ana Đuzel, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, "Sestre milosrdnice" University Hospital, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 May 16;7(5):547-54. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.547.
To investigate the results of endoscopic treatment of postoperative biliary leakage occurring after urgent cholecystectomy with a long-term follow-up.
This is an observational database study conducted in a tertiary care center. All consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) for presumed postoperative biliary leakage after urgent cholecystectomy in the period between April 2008 and April 2013 were considered for this study. Patients with bile duct transection and biliary strictures were excluded. Biliary leakage was suspected in the case of bile appearance from either percutaneous drainage of abdominal collection or abdominal drain placed at the time of cholecystectomy. Procedural and main clinical characteristics of all consecutive patients with postoperative biliary leakage after urgent cholecystectomy, such as indication for cholecystectomy, etiology and type of leakage, ERC findings and post-ERC complications, were collected from our electronic database. All patients in whom the leakage was successfully treated endoscopically were followed-up after they were discharged from the hospital and the main clinical characteristics, laboratory data and common bile duct diameter were electronically recorded.
During a five-year period, biliary leakage was recognized in 2.2% of patients who underwent urgent cholecystectomy. The median time from cholecystectomy to ERC was 6 d (interquartile range, 4-11 d). Endoscopic interventions to manage biliary leakage included biliary stent insertion with or without biliary sphincterotomy. In 23 (77%) patients after first endoscopic treatment bile flow through existing surgical drain ceased within 11 d following biliary therapeutic endoscopy (median, 4 d; interquartile range, 2-8 d). In those patients repeat ERC was not performed and the biliary stent was removed on gastroscopy. In seven (23%) patients repeat ERC was done within one to fourth week after their first ERC, depending on the extent of the biliary leakage. In two of those patients common bile duct stone was recognized and removed. Three of those seven patients had more complicated clinical course and they were referred to surgery and were excluded from long-term follow-up. The median interval from endoscopic placement of biliary stent to demonstration of resolution of bile leakage for ERC treated patients was 32 d (interquartile range, 28-43 d). Among the patients included in the follow-up (median 30.5 mo, range 7-59 mo), four patients (14.8%) died of severe underlying comorbid illnesses.
Our results demonstrate the great efficiency of the endoscopic therapy in the treatment of the patients with biliary leakage after urgent cholecystectomy.
探讨急诊胆囊切除术后胆漏的内镜治疗效果并进行长期随访。
这是一项在三级医疗中心进行的观察性数据库研究。纳入2008年4月至2013年4月期间因急诊胆囊切除术后疑似胆漏而接受内镜逆行胆管造影(ERC)的所有连续患者。排除胆管横断和胆管狭窄患者。若经皮腹腔引流液或胆囊切除时放置的腹腔引流管引出胆汁,则怀疑存在胆漏。从我们的电子数据库中收集所有急诊胆囊切除术后胆漏连续患者的手术及主要临床特征,如胆囊切除的指征、漏出的病因和类型、ERC检查结果及ERC术后并发症。所有经内镜成功治疗胆漏的患者出院后进行随访,电子记录其主要临床特征、实验室数据及胆总管直径。
在五年期间,急诊胆囊切除术后2.2%的患者出现胆漏。从胆囊切除到ERC的中位时间为6天(四分位间距,4 - 11天)。处理胆漏的内镜干预措施包括置入胆管支架,可伴或不伴胆管括约肌切开术。首次内镜治疗后,23例(77%)患者在胆管治疗性内镜检查后11天内(中位时间4天;四分位间距,2 - 8天)经现有手术引流管的胆汁引流停止。这些患者未进行重复ERC,且在胃镜检查时取出胆管支架。7例(23%)患者根据胆漏程度在首次ERC后的1至4周内进行了重复ERC。其中2例患者发现并取出胆总管结石。这7例患者中有3例临床病程更复杂,转诊至外科手术,未纳入长期随访。经ERC治疗的患者从内镜置入胆管支架到胆漏消失的中位间隔时间为32天(四分位间距,28 - 43天)。在纳入随访的患者中(中位时间30.5个月,范围7 - 59个月),4例患者(14.8%)死于严重的基础合并症。
我们的结果表明内镜治疗对急诊胆囊切除术后胆漏患者具有很高的疗效。