Baliki M N, Geha P Y, Apkarian A V
Department of Physiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):875-87. doi: 10.1152/jn.91100.2008. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
Assessing the size of objects rapidly and accurately clearly has survival value. A central multisensory module for subjective magnitude assessment is therefore highly likely, suggested by psychophysical studies, and proposed on theoretical grounds. Given that pain perception is fundamentally an assessment of stimulus intensity, it must necessarily engage such a central module. Accordingly, we compared functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity of pain magnitude ratings to matched visual magnitude ratings in 14 subjects. We show that brain activations segregate into two groups, one preferentially activated for pain and another equally activated for both visual and pain magnitude ratings. The properties of regions in the first group were consistent with encoding nociception, whereas those in the second group with attention and task control. Insular cortex responses similarly segregated to a pain-specific area and an area (extending to the lateral prefrontal cortex) conjointly representing perceived magnitudes for pain and vision. These two insular areas were differentiated by their relationship to task variance, ability to encode perceived magnitudes for each stimulus epoch, temporal delay differences, and brain intrinsic functional connectivity. In a second group of subjects (n=11) we contrasted diffusion tensor imaging-based white matter connectivity for these two insular areas and observed anatomical connectivity closely corresponding to the functional connectivity identified with fMRI. These results demonstrate that pain perception is due to the transformation of nociceptive representation into subjective magnitude assessment within the insula. Moreover, we argue that we have identified a multisensory cortical area for "how much" complementary and analogous to the "where" and "what" as described for central visual processing.
快速且准确地评估物体大小显然具有生存价值。因此,心理物理学研究表明并基于理论依据提出,很有可能存在一个用于主观大小评估的中央多感官模块。鉴于疼痛感知从根本上来说是对刺激强度的评估,它必然会涉及这样一个中央模块。相应地,我们比较了14名受试者在疼痛强度评级与匹配的视觉强度评级时的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)活动。我们发现大脑激活分为两组,一组在疼痛时优先被激活,另一组在视觉和疼痛强度评级时被同等激活。第一组区域的特性与编码伤害感受一致,而第二组区域的特性与注意力和任务控制一致。岛叶皮层的反应同样分为一个疼痛特异性区域和一个(延伸至外侧前额叶皮层)共同代表疼痛和视觉感知大小的区域。这两个岛叶区域通过它们与任务方差的关系、对每个刺激时段感知大小的编码能力、时间延迟差异以及大脑内在功能连接性来区分。在另一组受试者(n = 11)中,我们对比了这两个岛叶区域基于扩散张量成像的白质连接性,并观察到解剖学连接性与fMRI确定的功能连接性密切对应。这些结果表明,疼痛感知是由于伤害性表征在岛叶内转化为主观大小评估所致。此外,我们认为我们已经确定了一个用于“多少”的多感官皮层区域,它与中央视觉处理中所描述的“哪里”和“什么”互补且类似。