McQuarrie Emily P, Mackinnon Bruce, Young Barbara, Yeoman Lindsay, Stewart Graham, Fleming Stewart, Robertson Sue, Simpson Keith, Fox Jonathan, Geddes Colin C
Renal Unit, Western Infirmary, Dumbarton Road, Glasgow, G11 6NT.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 May;24(5):1524-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn677. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
UK native renal biopsy incidence is unknown. Biopsy registries in other countries indicate that the incidence of renal biopsy varies widely. Indications for renal biopsy are largely opinion based.
The Scottish Renal Biopsy Registry aimed to analyse the incidence of native renal biopsy in Scotland and examine indications and diagnoses obtained where practice varied widely.
Consecutive native adult renal biopsies performed in eight of the nine Scottish regions that include 82.4% of the population between 2002 and 2006 were examined. A total of 2480 native renal biopsies were performed equating 126.3 biopsies per million population per year (PMP/year). A total of 56.9% of patients were male, mean age 55.6 years (SD 1.3). The centres varied widely, from a lowest mean annual incidence of 65.8 PMP/year in Fife to the highest of 170.7 PMP/year in Tayside. The prospectively recorded indications and diagnoses were compared between Greater Glasgow, Clyde and Forth Valley (GC&FV) (population 1.56 million, 101.6 biopsies PMP/year) and Tayside (population 0.39 million, 177.4 biopsies PMP/year). Differing incidence of renal biopsy in these regions was mainly explained by patients with proteinuria and preserved renal function in the absence of nephrotic syndrome (19.2 PMP/year in GC&FV versus 60.8 PMP/year in Tayside), probably due to variation in nephrologists' opinion about the utility of biopsy for this indication. Tayside diagnosed more primary glomerulopathies, diabetic nephropathy and chronic ischaemia than GC&FV.
We have demonstrated wide regional variability in incidence of native renal biopsy within a single country, with analysis suggesting that this is mainly explained by uncertainty about the utility of renal biopsy for patients with proteinuria and preserved renal function. Further studies are required to determine the value of renal biopsy in this setting.
英国本土肾活检的发生率尚不清楚。其他国家的活检登记数据表明,肾活检的发生率差异很大。肾活检的指征很大程度上基于个人观点。
苏格兰肾活检登记处旨在分析苏格兰本土肾活检的发生率,并研究在实践差异很大的情况下所获得的指征和诊断结果。
对苏格兰九个地区中的八个地区在2002年至2006年期间进行的连续成年本土肾活检进行了检查,这些地区的人口占苏格兰总人口的82.4%。共进行了2480例本土肾活检,相当于每年每百万人口中有126.3例活检(PMP/年)。患者中56.9%为男性,平均年龄55.6岁(标准差1.3)。各中心差异很大,从法夫最低的年均发生率65.8 PMP/年到泰赛德最高的170.7 PMP/年。对大格拉斯哥、克莱德和福斯谷地区(GC&FV,人口156万,PMP/年活检率101.6)和泰赛德地区(人口39万,PMP/年活检率177.4)前瞻性记录的指征和诊断结果进行了比较。这些地区肾活检发生率的差异主要是由蛋白尿且肾功能正常但无肾病综合征的患者导致的(GC&FV地区为每年每百万人口中有19.2例,泰赛德地区为每年每百万人口中有60.8例),这可能是由于肾病学家对于该指征下活检效用的观点存在差异。泰赛德地区诊断出的原发性肾小球病、糖尿病肾病和慢性缺血性肾病比GC&FV地区更多。
我们证明了在一个国家内本土肾活检发生率存在广泛区域差异,分析表明这主要是由于对于蛋白尿且肾功能正常的患者进行肾活检的效用存在不确定性。需要进一步研究来确定在这种情况下肾活检的价值。