Suppr超能文献

A prospective study of incisional time, blood loss, pain, and healing with carbon dioxide laser, scalpel, and electrosurgery.

作者信息

Pearlman N W, Stiegmann G V, Vance V, Norton L W, Bell R C, Staerkel R, Van Way C W, Bartle E J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1991 Aug;126(8):1018-20. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410320108015.

Abstract

Carbon dioxide laser incisions are reported to be less painful, less bloody, and less prone to seroma formation and to heal better than scalpel or electrosurgical incisions. We compared all three modalities in a prospective randomized study of cholecystectomy incisions. Time required for the incision and incisional blood loss was less with electrosurgery than with the carbon dioxide laser or scalpel. Postoperative pain and wound healing, however, were the same for all three techniques. The carbon dioxide laser appears to offer no advantage over conventional means of making a standard incision.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验