• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cost and benefit of secondary prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.

作者信息

Castellano A R, Nettleman M D

机构信息

University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.

出版信息

JAMA. 1991 Aug 14;266(6):820-4.

PMID:1907671
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative cost and benefit of aerosolized pentamidine and the combination product of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim sulfate as secondary prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.

DESIGN

A Markov-based cost-benefit analysis was performed. Drug efficacies, toxicities, and mortality rates were drawn from the current literature.

SETTING

Hypothetical.

PATIENT POPULATION

Patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus who had had at least one episode of P carinii pneumonia.

INTERVENTIONS

Regimen 1 required the use of aerosolized pentamidine as the sole first-line prophylactic agent in all patients. Regimen 2 required the use of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim in all patients who had no history of a toxic reaction to the drug; only patients with a history of toxic effects and those who developed toxic effects while receiving the drug would receive aerosolized pentamidine. Regimen 3 required that no secondary prophylaxis be given.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Net cost, median patient survival, and 5-year survival for each regimen and for regimens 1 and 2 compared with regimen 3.

MAIN RESULTS

Regimen 2 was dominant, with a net cost of $6332 per patient and a median survival of 2.050 years. Compared with no prophylaxis, regimen 2 resulted in a savings of $16,503 per patient and a 0.696-year increase in median survival. Compared with regimen 1, regimen 2 resulted in a savings of $2904 and a 0.067-year increase in median survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary prophylaxis for P carinii saves money and extends survival. Current data suggest that sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim should be given whenever it can be tolerated. Use of aerosolized pentamidine as a first-line agent would result in a modest increase in cost and a decrease in life expectancy.

摘要

相似文献

1
Cost and benefit of secondary prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.
JAMA. 1991 Aug 14;266(6):820-4.
2
Trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole appears more effective than aerosolized pentamidine as secondary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with AIDS.在预防艾滋病患者卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎的二级预防中,甲氧苄啶 - 磺胺甲恶唑似乎比雾化喷他脒更有效。
AIDS. 1992 Feb;6(2):165-71. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199202000-00004.
3
Validating literature-based models with direct clinical trial results: the cost-effectiveness of secondary prophylaxis for PCP in AIDS patients.用直接临床试验结果验证基于文献的模型:艾滋病患者肺孢子菌肺炎二级预防的成本效益
Med Decis Making. 1996 Jan-Mar;16(1):29-35. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600110.
4
Primary prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in HIV-infected people with CD4 counts below 200/mm3: a cost-effectiveness analysis.对CD4细胞计数低于200/mm³的HIV感染者进行卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎的一级预防:一项成本效益分析。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1988). 1991;4(5):521-31.
5
A controlled trial of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or aerosolized pentamidine for secondary prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 021.一项关于甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑或雾化喷他脒对获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎二级预防的对照试验。艾滋病临床试验组方案021。
N Engl J Med. 1992 Dec 24;327(26):1842-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199212243272604.
6
A controlled trial of aerosolized pentamidine or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as primary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. The Dutch AIDS Treatment Group.雾化喷他脒或甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑作为人类免疫缺陷病毒感染患者卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎一级预防的对照试验。荷兰艾滋病治疗组。
N Engl J Med. 1992 Dec 24;327(26):1836-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199212243272603.
7
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus aerosolized pentamidine for primary prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. LFPMI Study Group. Ligue Française de Prévention des Maladies Infectieuses.甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑与雾化喷他脒用于卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎的一级预防:一项前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验。LFPMI研究组。法国传染病预防联盟。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1988). 1994 May;7(5):457-62.
8
Recommendations for prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia for adults and adolescents infected with human immunodeficiency virus.
MMWR Recomm Rep. 1992 Apr 10;41(RR-4):1-11.
9
A meta-analysis of the relative efficacy and toxicity of Pneumocystis carinii prophylactic regimens.卡氏肺孢子虫预防方案相对疗效和毒性的荟萃分析。
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jan 22;156(2):177-88.
10
A comparison of the effectiveness of three regimens in the prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.三种治疗方案对预防人类免疫缺陷病毒感染患者卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎有效性的比较。
Arch Intern Med. 1992 Mar;152(3):523-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The HIV Cure Research Agenda: The Role of Mathematical Modelling and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.《艾滋病治愈研究议程:数学建模与成本效益分析的作用》
J Virus Erad. 2015;1(4):245-249. doi: 10.1016/S2055-6640(20)30929-8. Epub 2015 Sep 27.
2
Cost effectiveness of prophylaxis for opportunistic infections in AIDS. An overview and methodological discussion.艾滋病机会性感染预防的成本效益。概述与方法学讨论。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Aug;14(2):165-74. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814020-00005.
3
Statistical analysis in pharmacoeconomic studies. A review of current issues and standards.
药物经济学研究中的统计分析。当前问题与标准综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Jun;9(6):506-16. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199609060-00005.
4
Clinical and economic aspects of prophylaxis and treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎预防与治疗的临床及经济学方面
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Feb;7(2):95-8. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199507020-00001.
5
Institutional formularies: the relevance of pharmacoeconomic analysis to formulary decisions.机构处方集:药物经济学分析与处方集决策的相关性。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Apr;1(4):265-81. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199201040-00004.