Bonis Peter A, Pickens Gary T, Rind David M, Foster David A
Center for Clinical Evidence Synthesis at the Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, UpToDate Inc., Waltham, MA 02453, United States.
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Nov;77(11):745-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 Jun 19.
Electronic clinical knowledge support systems have decreased barriers to answering clinical questions but there is little evidence as to whether they have an impact on health outcomes.
We compared hospitals with online access to UpToDate with other acute care hospitals included in the Thomson 100 Top Hospitals Database (Thomson database). Metrics used in the Thomson database differentiate hospitals on a variety of performance dimensions such as quality and efficiency. Prespecified outcomes were risk-adjusted mortality, complications, the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators, and hospital length of stay among Medicare beneficiaries. Linear regression models were developed that included adjustment for hospital region, teaching status, and discharge volume.
Hospitals with access to UpToDate (n=424) were associated with significantly better performance than other hospitals in the Thomson database (n=3091) on risk-adjusted measures of patient safety (P=0.0163) and complications (P=0.0012) and had significantly shorter length of stay (by on average 0.167 days per discharge, 95% confidence interval 0.081-0.252 days, P<0.0001). All of these associations correlated significantly with how much UpToDate was used at each hospital. Mortality was not significantly different between UpToDate and non-UpToDate hospitals.
The study was retrospective and observational and could not fully account for additional features at the included hospitals that may also have been associated with better health outcomes.
An electronic clinical knowledge support system (UpToDate was associated with improved health outcomes and shorter length of stay among Medicare beneficiaries in acute care hospitals in the United States. Additional studies are needed to clarify whether use of UpToDate is a marker for the better performance, an independent cause of it, or a synergistic part of other quality improvement characteristics at better-performing hospitals.
电子临床知识支持系统降低了回答临床问题的障碍,但几乎没有证据表明它们对健康结果有影响。
我们将可在线访问UpToDate的医院与汤姆森百强医院数据库(汤姆森数据库)中纳入的其他急性护理医院进行了比较。汤姆森数据库中使用的指标在各种绩效维度(如质量和效率)上区分医院。预先设定的结果包括风险调整后的死亡率、并发症、医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全指标以及医疗保险受益人的住院时间。开发了线性回归模型,其中包括对医院地区、教学状况和出院量的调整。
在患者安全(P = 0.0163)和并发症(P = 0.0012)的风险调整指标方面,可访问UpToDate的医院(n = 424)与汤姆森数据库中的其他医院(n = 3091)相比,表现明显更好,且住院时间明显更短(平均每次出院缩短0.167天,95%置信区间为0.081 - 0.252天,P < 0.0001)。所有这些关联都与每家医院对UpToDate的使用程度显著相关。使用UpToDate的医院和未使用的医院之间死亡率没有显著差异。
该研究是回顾性观察性研究,无法完全解释纳入医院中可能也与更好的健康结果相关的其他特征。
电子临床知识支持系统(UpToDate)与美国急性护理医院中医疗保险受益人的健康结果改善和住院时间缩短相关。需要进一步的研究来阐明使用UpToDate是表现更好的标志、其独立原因,还是表现更好的医院中其他质量改进特征的协同部分。