Loyens Sofie M M, Rikers Remy M J P, Schmidt Henk G
Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2009 Sep;79(Pt 3):501-14. doi: 10.1348/000709908X378117. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
Constructivist views of learning have brought conceptions of learning to attention again. Conceptions are considered important determinants of effective learning. Students can differ in their conceptions depending on their educational experience.
The present study investigated students' conceptions of constructivist learning. Do students with greater experience in their academic programme differ in their conceptions of constructivist learning compared to students with less experience? In addition, to what extent are conceptions of constructivist learning different in a conventional, lecture-based curriculum compared to a constructivist, problem-based learning curriculum?
Three groups (i.e. first-year, second-year, and third-year students) in two different curricula (i.e. conventional, lecture-based and constructivist, problem-based) were tested.
A cross-sectional design was used. Students' conceptions of constructivist activities (i.e. knowledge construction, cooperative learning, self-regulation, use of authentic problems, self-perceived inability to learn, and motivation to learn) were measured by a questionnaire. Data were analyzed using a two-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA).
A significant difference in questionnaire's scores between year 1 and year 2 (but not between year 2 and 3) was found with respect to conceptions about knowledge construction, self-regulation, and the use of authentic problems, but not for cooperative learning and motivation to learn. For self-perceived inability, an interaction effect was found. Furthermore, results showed significant differences between both curriculum groups on all dependent measures.
Differences in conceptions can be perceived between students who enter a new learning programme (i.e. higher education) and students who already have one year of experience in higher education. Among students with more than one year of educational experience, differences disappear. Furthermore, this study shows that the learning environment can make a difference with respect to students' conceptions of constructivist learning activities.
建构主义的学习观再次引起了人们对学习概念的关注。概念被认为是有效学习的重要决定因素。学生的概念可能因其教育经历而有所不同。
本研究调查了学生对建构主义学习的概念。与经验较少的学生相比,学术课程经验更丰富的学生对建构主义学习的概念是否存在差异?此外,与基于建构主义的问题式学习课程相比,传统的基于讲座的课程中建构主义学习的概念在多大程度上有所不同?
对两种不同课程(即传统的基于讲座的课程和建构主义的问题式学习课程)中的三组学生(即一年级、二年级和三年级学生)进行了测试。
采用横断面设计。通过问卷调查来衡量学生对建构主义活动(即知识建构、合作学习、自我调节、使用真实问题、自我感知的学习无能以及学习动机)的概念。使用双向多变量方差分析(MANOVA)对数据进行分析。
在知识建构、自我调节和使用真实问题的概念方面,发现一年级和二年级学生在问卷得分上存在显著差异(但二年级和三年级之间没有),但在合作学习和学习动机方面没有差异。对于自我感知的无能,发现了交互作用效应。此外,结果显示两组课程在所有相关测量指标上均存在显著差异。
进入新学习项目(即高等教育)的学生与已经有一年高等教育经验的学生在概念上存在差异。在有一年以上教育经验的学生中,差异消失。此外,本研究表明学习环境会影响学生对建构主义学习活动的概念。