• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Local implementation of cancer control activities in rural Appalachia, 2006.2006年阿巴拉契亚农村地区癌症控制活动的地方实施情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2009 Jan;6(1):A34. Epub 2008 Dec 15.
2
The mountains hold things in: the use of community research review work groups to address cancer disparities in Appalachia.群山环抱万物:利用社区研究审查工作小组解决阿巴拉契亚地区的癌症差异问题。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007 Nov;34(6):1133-9. doi: 10.1188/07.ONF.1133-1139.
3
Disparities in underserved white populations: the case of cancer-related disparities in Appalachia.服务不足的白人人口中的差异:阿巴拉契亚地区癌症相关差异的案例。
Oncologist. 2011;16(8):1072-81. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0145.
4
The Appalachia Cancer Network: cancer control research among a rural, medically underserved population.阿巴拉契亚癌症网络:针对农村医疗服务不足人群的癌症控制研究。
J Rural Health. 2004 Spring;20(2):181-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2004.tb00026.x.
5
Advancing engagement and capacity for rural cancer control: a mixed-methods case study of a Community-Academic Advisory Board in the Appalachia region of Southwest Virginia.推进农村癌症控制的参与度和能力:弗吉尼亚州西南部阿巴拉契亚地区社区-学术咨询委员会的混合方法案例研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 22;7(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00285-y.
6
Community strategies to address cancer disparities in Appalachian Kentucky.阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州解决癌症差异的社区策略。
Fam Community Health. 2012 Jan-Mar;35(1):31-43. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e3182385d2c.
7
The minigrant model: a strategy to promote local implementation of state cancer plans in Appalachian communities.小额资助模式:促进阿巴拉契亚社区执行国家癌症计划的策略。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 Jul;8(4):A89. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
8
Rural health professions education at East Tennessee State University: survey of graduates from the first decade of the community partnership program.东田纳西州立大学的农村卫生专业教育:社区合作项目首个十年毕业生调查
J Rural Health. 2007 Winter;23(1):77-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00071.x.
9
Qualitative needs assessment: healthcare experiences of underserved populations in Montgomery County, Virginia, USA.定性需求评估:美国弗吉尼亚州蒙哥马利县服务不足人群的医疗保健经历
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:1816. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
10
Appalachian regional model for organizing and sustaining county-level diabetes coalitions.阿巴拉契亚地区县级糖尿病联盟组织与维持模式
Health Promot Pract. 2011 Jul;12(4):544-50. doi: 10.1177/1524839910377965. Epub 2011 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies for recruiting a sample of adults with type 2 diabetes from primary care clinics in rural Appalachia: Incorporating cultural competence.从阿巴拉契亚农村地区基层医疗诊所招募2型糖尿病成年患者样本的策略:融入文化能力。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2018 Jul 19;5(3):230-237. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.06.003. eCollection 2018 Jul 10.
2
An Interactive, Mobile-Based Tool for Personal Social Network Data Collection and Visualization Among a Geographically Isolated and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Population: Early-Stage Feasibility Study With Qualitative User Feedback.一种基于移动设备的交互式工具,用于在地理上孤立且社会经济处于不利地位的人群中收集和可视化个人社交网络数据:基于定性用户反馈的早期可行性研究。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Jun 22;6(6):e124. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6927.
3
Disparities in recommended preventive care usage among persons living with diabetes in the Appalachian region.阿巴拉契亚地区糖尿病患者在推荐预防性护理使用方面的差异。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016 Dec 23;4(1):e000284. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000284. eCollection 2016.
4
Engaging the underserved: a process model to mobilize rural community health coalitions as partners in translational research.服务未得到充分满足的人群:一种将农村社区健康联盟动员为转化研究合作伙伴的过程模型。
Clin Transl Sci. 2014 Aug;7(4):300-6. doi: 10.1111/cts.12168. Epub 2014 May 19.
5
Assessment of cancer education seminars for Appalachian populations.阿巴拉契亚人群癌症教育研讨会评估
J Cancer Educ. 2012 Jun;27(2):287-93. doi: 10.1007/s13187-011-0291-2.

本文引用的文献

1
The mountains hold things in: the use of community research review work groups to address cancer disparities in Appalachia.群山环抱万物:利用社区研究审查工作小组解决阿巴拉契亚地区的癌症差异问题。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007 Nov;34(6):1133-9. doi: 10.1188/07.ONF.1133-1139.
2
Appalachia: where place matters in health.阿巴拉契亚:地域对健康至关重要之地。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Oct;3(4):A113. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
3
Using data to motivate action: the need for high quality, an effective presentation, and an action context for decision-making.利用数据推动行动:高质量、有效呈现及决策行动背景的必要性。
Cancer Causes Control. 2005 Oct;16 Suppl 1:15-25. doi: 10.1007/s10552-005-0457-5.
4
Cancer incidence in Kentucky, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia: disparities in Appalachia.肯塔基州、宾夕法尼亚州和西弗吉尼亚州的癌症发病率:阿巴拉契亚地区的差异。
J Rural Health. 2005 Winter;21(1):39-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2005.tb00060.x.
5
Cancer death rates--Appalachia, 1994-1998.癌症死亡率——阿巴拉契亚地区,1994 - 1998年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002 Jun 21;51(24):527-9.

2006年阿巴拉契亚农村地区癌症控制活动的地方实施情况。

Local implementation of cancer control activities in rural Appalachia, 2006.

作者信息

Behringer Bruce, Mabe Karen Harrell, Dorgan Kelly A, Hutson Sadie P

机构信息

Office of Rural and Community Health and Community Partnerships, East Tennessee State University, PO Box 70412, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2009 Jan;6(1):A34. Epub 2008 Dec 15.

PMID:19080040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2644615/
Abstract

Underserved communities with high cancer rates often are not involved in implementing state cancer control activities locally. An East Tennessee State University research team formed 2 Appalachian Community Cancer Research Review Work Groups, 1 in northeast Tennessee and 1 in southwest Virginia. During 4 sessions, the research team presented regional cancer data to the work groups. Work group participants explored research from a lay perspective and identified possible reasons for cancer disparities in central Appalachia. The fifth session was a community dissemination activity in which work group participants engaged in cancer education and action by presenting the research to their local communities in unique ways. During a sixth session, both work groups discussed these interventions and further attempted to answer the question, "What makes the experience of cancer unique in Appalachia?" This article describes the key steps of this community-based participatory research process.

摘要

癌症发病率高但医疗服务不足的社区往往未参与在当地实施州级癌症控制活动。东田纳西州立大学的一个研究团队组建了两个阿巴拉契亚社区癌症研究审查工作组,一个位于田纳西州东北部,另一个位于弗吉尼亚州西南部。在4次会议期间,该研究团队向工作组展示了区域癌症数据。工作组成员从普通民众的角度探讨了研究,并确定了阿巴拉契亚中部地区癌症差异的可能原因。第五次会议是一次社区传播活动,工作组成员通过以独特方式向当地社区展示研究成果,参与了癌症教育和行动。在第六次会议期间,两个工作组讨论了这些干预措施,并进一步试图回答“是什么使得阿巴拉契亚地区的癌症经历独一无二?”这一问题。本文描述了这一基于社区的参与性研究过程的关键步骤。