Makino Tomoki, Doki Yuichiro, Miyata Hiroshi, Yasuda Takushi, Yamasaki Makoto, Fujiwara Yoshiyuki, Takiguchi Shuji, Higuchi Ichiro, Hatazawa Jun, Monden Morito
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Surgery. 2008 Nov;144(5):793-802. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.06.026. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) targets lymph node metastasis (LN), as well as the primary tumor (PT) in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC). (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) reflects viable tumor volume and may be more useful for evaluating NACT responses than conventional radiography. Moreover, FDG-PET may elucidate the clinical significance of NACT responses for LN, which is not always identical to those for PT.
We retrospectively investigated prognostic factors in 38 node-positive ESCC patients who had undergone NACT (5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, and cisplatin) and surgical resection. The NACT response was evaluated separately by both PET and computed tomography (CT) for each PT and LN.
Although NACT effect for PT and LN was similar by PET evaluation (SUVmax reduction; average 70.58% vs 71.57%), they did not show significant correlation, revealing discordance for 13 (34.2%) patients when SUVmax reduction of more than 70% was classified as a PET responder. An opposite relationship existed in that the pre-NACT SUVmax of PT was significantly lower in PET responders than in PET non-responders (9.92 +/- 4.3 vs 12.96 +/- 3.8, P = .032), while that of LN tended to be higher in responders than in non-responders (5.70 +/- 3.2 vs 3.77 +/- 0.9, P = .072). Multivariate analysis identified the number of PET-positive LN (P = .018, HR = 5.464) and PET response for PT (P = .015, HR = 4.620) and for LN (P = .028, HR = 3.854) as independent prognostic predictors. The NACT response for PT or LN on CT evaluation was not a significant prognostic predictor.
PET is superior to CT for evaluating the NACT response from the viewpoint of survival analysis. The NACT response should be evaluated for both LN and PT because of their different behaviors during chemotherapy. Further studies of larger sample number should be conducted in the future.
新辅助化疗(NACT)针对食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)中的淋巴结转移(LN)以及原发肿瘤(PT)。氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)可反映存活肿瘤体积,在评估NACT疗效方面可能比传统放射成像更有用。此外,FDG-PET可能阐明NACT对LN疗效的临床意义,这与对PT的疗效并不总是相同。
我们回顾性研究了38例接受NACT(5-氟尿嘧啶、阿霉素和顺铂)及手术切除的淋巴结阳性ESCC患者的预后因素。通过PET和计算机断层扫描(CT)分别对每个PT和LN的NACT疗效进行评估。
尽管通过PET评估PT和LN的NACT效果相似(SUVmax降低;平均分别为70.58%和71.57%),但它们之间未显示出显著相关性,当将SUVmax降低超过70%归类为PET反应者时,有13例(34.2%)患者出现不一致情况。存在相反的关系,即PET反应者中PT的NACT前SUVmax显著低于无反应者(9.92±4.3对12.96±3.8,P = 0.032),而LN的NACT前SUVmax在反应者中往往高于无反应者(5.70±3.2对3.77±0.9,P = 0.072)。多变量分析确定PET阳性LN的数量(P = 0.018,HR = 5.464)以及PT(P = 0.015,HR = 4.620)和LN(P = 0.028,HR = 3.854)的PET反应为独立的预后预测因素。CT评估中PT或LN的NACT反应不是显著的预后预测因素。
从生存分析的角度来看,PET在评估NACT反应方面优于CT。由于LN和PT在化疗期间的行为不同,应对两者的NACT反应进行评估。未来应进行更大样本量的进一步研究。