Ruffell Alastair, Donnelly Colm, Carver Naomi, Murphy Eileen, Murray Emily, McCambridge James
School of Geography, Archaeology & Palaeoecology, Queen's University Belfast, BT7 1NN Northern Ireland, UK.
Forensic Sci Int. 2009 Jan 10;183(1-3):e11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.10.013. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
Geographic location, time of reporting and need for rapid evaluation contributed to a lack of intelligence concerning a suspect burial site in scrub woodland (approximately 15 km from the last known location of a missing person) in Northern Ireland. Police received reports of a subsiding 'grave', which was evaluated positively using GPR and victim recovery dogs (VRD). After 24h work, archaeological excavation showed a vertical-sided, stepped excavation on undisturbed clay with no inhumation. Subsequent research showed the feature to be an engineering trial pit. The GPR response was a water table and rocks, VRD were possibly reacting to disturbed ground. The work serves as a demonstration of good archaeological practice in suspect burial excavation, following a lack of landscape evaluation and poor overall intelligence.
地理位置、报告时间以及快速评估的需求,导致了关于北爱尔兰灌木林地(距离一名失踪人员最后已知地点约15公里)一处疑似埋葬地点的情报不足。警方收到了一个正在下陷的“坟墓”的报告,使用探地雷达(GPR)和受害者搜寻犬(VRD)对其进行了积极评估。经过24小时的工作,考古发掘显示在未受扰动的黏土上有一个垂直面、有台阶的挖掘坑,但没有发现埋葬情况。随后的研究表明,该特征是一个工程试验坑。探地雷达的反应是地下水位和岩石,受害者搜寻犬可能是对扰动的地面做出反应。在缺乏景观评估和整体情报不佳的情况下,这项工作展示了在疑似埋葬挖掘中良好的考古实践。