Ruttan Lesley, Martin Krystle, Liu Anita, Colella Brenda, Green Robin E
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Dec;89(12 Suppl):S69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.007.
To examine long-term outcome of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) on timed and untimed cognitive tests using meta-analysis.
Meta-analysis examining outcome at 2 epochs, 6 to 18 months postinjury (epoch 1) and 4.5 to 11 years postinjury (epoch 2).
Data source was published articles (1966-2007) identified through electronic and manual search.
A total of 1380 subjects with moderate to severe TBI participated in the 16 studies meeting inclusion criteria.
Not applicable.
Timed and untimed neuropsychologic tests with quantitative results (means, SDs, t, and df tests) from studies containing a healthy comparison group and a mean time since injury falling within 1 of the 2 epochs.
Patient versus control weighted effect sizes were medium to large at epoch 1 for both untimed tasks (r=-.46; confidence interval [CI], -.32 to -.65) and timed tasks (r=-.46; CI, -.35 to -.59). At epoch 2, effect sizes were slightly smaller for untimed tasks (r=-.38; CI, -.25 to -.60) and timed tasks (r=-.40; CI, -.32 to -.62).
Patients showed robust, persisting impairments on both timed and untimed tests at recovery plateau (ie, 6-18mo postinjury) and many years later. These findings converge with previous studies, though using an alternative approach that obviates some of the methodologic problems of longitudinal studies, such as selective attrition.
采用荟萃分析方法,研究中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)在定时和非定时认知测试中的长期预后。
荟萃分析,研究伤后两个时间段的预后,即伤后6至18个月(第一阶段)和伤后4.5至11年(第二阶段)。
数据来源为通过电子和人工检索确定的已发表文章(1966 - 2007年)。
共有1380例中重度TBI患者参与了符合纳入标准的16项研究。
不适用。
来自包含健康对照组且伤后平均时间处于两个阶段之一的研究的定时和非定时神经心理学测试,测试结果为定量数据(均值、标准差、t检验和自由度检验)。
在第一阶段,患者与对照组的加权效应量对于非定时任务(r = -0.46;置信区间[CI],-0.32至-0.65)和定时任务(r = -0.46;CI,-0.35至-0.59)均为中等至较大。在第二阶段,非定时任务的效应量略小(r = -0.38;CI,-0.25至-0.60),定时任务的效应量为(r = -0.40;CI,-0.32至-0.62)。
患者在恢复平稳期(即伤后6 - 18个月)和多年后,在定时和非定时测试中均表现出明显且持续的损伤。这些发现与先前的研究一致,尽管采用了一种替代方法,避免了纵向研究的一些方法学问题,如选择性损耗。