R&D Strategic Solutions, Lexington, MA 02421, USA.
Law Hum Behav. 2009 Oct;33(5):393-404. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9164-6. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
Defendants often provide accounts that minimize their responsibility for the accused offense. Jurors attribute responsibility to defendants and decide legal outcomes based on the given account. The current research examined the effects of accounts (i.e., excuse, justification, denial, and no explanation) and the defendant's remorse display (i.e., remorseful, remorseless) on mock jurors' judgments. Participants acquitted the defendant in the denial condition most often and recommended the most lenient punishment in the justification condition. The remorseful defendant was found guilty more frequently than the remorseless defendant in the no explanation and (marginally) excuse conditions. Limitations and future research are discussed.
被告通常会提供减轻其对被指控罪行责任的陈述。陪审员根据所给陈述将责任归咎于被告,并做出法律判决。本研究考察了陈述(即借口、辩解、否认和无解释)和被告的悔恨表现(即悔恨、无悔)对模拟陪审员判断的影响。参与者在否认的情况下最常宣判被告无罪,并在辩解的情况下建议最宽大的处罚。在无解释和(略有)借口的情况下,悔恨的被告比无悔的被告更容易被判有罪。讨论了限制和未来的研究。