Argo Joshua L, Yellumahanthi Durgamani K, Ballem Naveen, Harrigan Mark R, Fisher Winfield S, Wesley Mary M, Taylor Tracy H, Clements Ronald H
Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-0016, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jul;23(7):1449-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0245-x. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) is the mainstay of therapy for hydrocephalus. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of laparoscopic (LVPS) versus open (OVPS) techniques for placement of distal VPS catheters.
All patients undergoing new VPS placement at a tertiary care center between January 2004 and August 2007 were included. Univariate analysis was performed. Wilcoxon rank-sum, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests were used to make comparisons between LVPS and OVPS groups. Stepwise backward logistic regression was performed to predict complications requiring operative intervention. A Kaplan-Meier estimate of the survival function was calculated for shunt survival. All data is presented as median and range unless otherwise specified.
Five hundred thirty-five consecutive patients underwent 579 VPS (258 LVPS, 321 OVPS). Median age (52.0 years) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (3) were similar in LVPS and OVPS groups. Body mass index (BMI) [27.8 (17.0-64.9) kg/m(2) versus 25.9 (12.3-44.4) kg/m(2), p = 0.007], previous operations [0.8 +/- 0.9 versus 0.6 +/- 0.7, p = 0.004 (mean +/- standard deviation)], estimated blood loss (EBL) [20 (0-175) ml versus 25 (0-500) ml, p < 0.001], operating room (OR) time [37.5 (17.0-152.0) min versus 52.0 (20.0-197.0) min, p < 0.001], and length of stay (LOS) [11 (1-77) days versus 14 (1-225) days, p = 0.016] were statistically different between the LVPS and OVPS groups, respectively. LVPS abdominal complication rate of 5.8% and OVPS rate of 6.9% were similar (p = 0.611). Previous abdominal operation [odds ratio (OR) 1.673, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.100-2.543, p = 0.016] and previous VPS (OR 1.929, 95% CI 1.147-3.243, p = 0.016) were significant predictors of complications requiring operative intervention. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no difference in survival between LVPS and OVPS groups (p = 0.538), with overall shunt survival of 86.4% at 6 months and 83.0% at 1 year.
LVPS is associated with decreased OR time, less blood loss, and shorter LOS with no difference in complication rate when compared OVPS. The laparoscopic approach for VPS is a safe, effective, and readily reproducible alternative to the traditional open approach.
脑室腹腔分流术(VPS)是脑积水治疗的主要方法。本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜下(LVPS)与开放手术(OVPS)放置远端VPS导管的效果。
纳入2004年1月至2007年8月在一家三级医疗中心接受新的VPS置入术的所有患者。进行单因素分析。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验、卡方检验和Fisher精确检验对LVPS组和OVPS组进行比较。采用逐步向后逻辑回归预测需要手术干预的并发症。计算分流管存活的Kaplan-Meier生存函数估计值。除非另有说明,所有数据均以中位数和范围表示。
535例连续患者接受了579次VPS手术(258例LVPS,321例OVPS)。LVPS组和OVPS组的中位年龄(52.0岁)和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分(3分)相似。体重指数(BMI)[27.8(17.0 - 64.9)kg/m²对25.9(12.3 - 44.4)kg/m²,p = 0.007]、既往手术史[0.8 ± 0.9对0.6 ± 0.7,p = 0.004(平均值 ± 标准差)]、估计失血量(EBL)[20(0 - 175)ml对25(0 - 500)ml,p < 0.001]、手术室(OR)时间[37.5(17.0 - 152.0)分钟对52.0(20.0 - 197.0)分钟,p < 0.001]和住院时间(LOS)[11(1 - 77)天对14(1 - 225)天,p = 0.016]在LVPS组和OVPS组之间分别存在统计学差异。LVPS的腹部并发症发生率为5.8%,OVPS为6.9%,两者相似(p = 0.611)。既往腹部手术[比值比(OR)1.673,95%置信区间(CI)1.100 - 2.543,p = 0.016]和既往VPS手术(OR 1.929,95% CI 1.147 - 3.243,p = 0.016)是需要手术干预的并发症的重要预测因素。Kaplan-Meier分析显示LVPS组和OVPS组的生存率无差异(p = 0.538),6个月时总体分流管生存率为86.4%,1年时为83.0%。
与OVPS相比,LVPS手术时间缩短、失血量减少、住院时间缩短,并发症发生率无差异。VPS的腹腔镜手术方法是传统开放手术安全、有效且易于重复的替代方法。