• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊麻醉:破除常见误解

Office-based anesthesia: dispelling common myths.

作者信息

Blake Douglas R

机构信息

Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

Aesthet Surg J. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):564-70; discussion 571-2. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2008.07.012.

DOI:10.1016/j.asj.2008.07.012
PMID:19083580
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Running parallel with-and perhaps driven by-the huge increase in demand for cosmetic surgery, office-based anesthesia (OBA) is the fastest growing segment of anesthesia practice. Despite this, only 2% of anesthesiology residencies provide exposure to OBA, and many practicing anesthesiologists are not convinced that OBA techniques provide safe, reliable, and effective anesthesia care.

OBJECTIVE

To examine OBA techniques and safety records while addressing some of the commonly held beliefs among anesthesiologists regarding OBA.

METHODS

A review of 4800 patients undergoing 5264 cosmetic surgical procedures performed between 1997 and 2007 at Dudley Street Operatory (licensed in Rhode Island as a Physician Office Setting Providing Surgical Treatment and certified by the American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities) was conducted. The primary anesthetic technique was deep sedation with a propofol ketamine infusion, combined with local anesthetic injection. Intercostal nerve blocks were performed before surgery in patients who had breast surgery and/or abdominoplasty. Endotracheal or laryngeal mask airway techniques were not used, nor were paralyzing agents, anesthetic gases, or vapors.

RESULTS

There were 16 unanticipated postoperative admissions in 10 years, all but 3 from surgical complications (hematoma, infection, and pneumothorax during dissection for breast implants). One patient had an acute reaction to a small volume of local anesthetic injected into the nasal septum, one patient with a history of panic attacks had an acute anxiety attack manifested as chest pain, and one patient refused discharge from the operatory to home after a face lift, despite meeting postanesthesia care unit discharge criteria, and was admitted overnight to the hospital. There were no hospital admissions because of pain, nausea, or excessive sedation.

CONCLUSIONS

In experienced hands, OBA techniques deliver an anesthetic for office-based cosmetic surgery superior to the usual general anesthesia performed in hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers. These techniques are safe, do not require expensive equipment other than an infusion pump and vital signs monitor, avoid sore throats and nausea, provide postoperative analgesia, and are well received by patients and surgeons. OBA presents an opportunity for anesthesiologists and aesthetic surgeons to partner for greater patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景

随着整容手术需求的大幅增长,且可能受其推动,门诊麻醉(OBA)是麻醉业务中增长最快的领域。尽管如此,只有2%的麻醉住院医师接触过门诊麻醉,而且许多执业麻醉医师并不确信门诊麻醉技术能提供安全、可靠且有效的麻醉护理。

目的

检查门诊麻醉技术和安全记录,同时解决麻醉医师中一些关于门诊麻醉的普遍看法。

方法

对1997年至2007年在达德利街手术室进行的4800例患者的5264例整容手术进行回顾(该手术室在罗德岛州作为提供手术治疗的医师办公室环境获得许可,并经美国门诊手术设施认证协会认证)。主要麻醉技术是异丙酚 - 氯胺酮输注深度镇静,联合局部麻醉注射。对接受乳房手术和/或腹部整形手术的患者在手术前进行肋间神经阻滞。未使用气管内插管或喉罩气道技术,也未使用肌松剂、麻醉气体或蒸汽。

结果

10年间有16例意外术后住院,除3例因手术并发症(乳房植入物剥离过程中的血肿、感染和气胸)外。1例患者对注入鼻中隔的少量局部麻醉药有急性反应,1例有惊恐发作史的患者出现以胸痛为表现的急性焦虑发作,1例患者在面部提升术后尽管符合麻醉后护理单元出院标准,但拒绝从手术室出院回家,住院过夜。没有因疼痛、恶心或过度镇静而住院的情况。

结论

在经验丰富的人员操作下,门诊麻醉技术为门诊整容手术提供的麻醉效果优于医院和门诊手术中心通常进行的全身麻醉。这些技术安全,除了输液泵和生命体征监测仪外不需要昂贵设备,可避免喉咙痛和恶心,提供术后镇痛,且受到患者和外科医生的好评。门诊麻醉为麻醉医师和美容外科医生合作提高患者满意度提供了机会。

相似文献

1
Office-based anesthesia: dispelling common myths.门诊麻醉:破除常见误解
Aesthet Surg J. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):564-70; discussion 571-2. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2008.07.012.
2
Safety and efficacy of office-based surgery with monitored anesthesia care/sedation in 4778 consecutive plastic surgery procedures.4778例连续整形外科手术中门诊手术在麻醉监护/镇静下的安全性和有效性。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Jan;111(1):150-6; discussion 157-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000037756.88297.BC.
3
Office-based outpatient plastic surgery utilizing total intravenous anesthesia.门诊手术室全身静脉麻醉下的整形手术。
Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Feb;33(2):270-4. doi: 10.1177/1090820X12472694. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
4
Office-based anesthesia for the urologist.泌尿科医师的门诊麻醉
Urol Clin North Am. 2013 Nov;40(4):497-519. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2013.07.008.
5
A comparison of infraclavicular nerve block versus general anesthesia for hand and wrist day-case surgeries.锁骨下神经阻滞与全身麻醉用于手部和腕部日间手术的比较。
Anesthesiology. 2004 Jul;101(1):127-32. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200407000-00020.
6
Effectiveness of ondansetron as an adjunct to lidocaine intravenous regional anesthesia on tourniquet pain and postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective hand surgery: a systematic review protocol.昂丹司琼作为利多卡因静脉区域麻醉辅助药物对择期手部手术患者止血带疼痛和术后疼痛的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):27-38. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1768.
7
Office-based anesthesia: safety and outcomes.门诊麻醉:安全性与结局
Anesth Analg. 2014 Aug;119(2):276-285. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000313.
8
Comparison of methohexital and propofol use in ambulatory procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery.美索比妥与丙泊酚在口腔颌面外科门诊手术中的应用比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Oct;66(10):1996-2003. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.028.
9
Propofol-ketamine technique: dissociative anesthesia for office surgery (a 5-year review of 1264 cases).丙泊酚-氯胺酮技术:门诊手术的分离麻醉(1264例病例的5年回顾)
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999 Jan-Feb;23(1):70-5. doi: 10.1007/s002669900245.
10
Providing value in ambulatory anesthesia.提供门诊麻醉的价值。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Dec;28(6):617-22. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000255.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigation of Abdominoplasty Without General Anesthesia: A Scoping Review.非全身麻醉下腹部整形术的研究:一项范围综述
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 Dec 18:22925503241301711. doi: 10.1177/22925503241301711.