Suppr超能文献

在非诺贝特干预与糖尿病事件降低(FIELD)研究之后:对非诺贝特的启示

After the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study: implications for fenofibrate.

作者信息

Sacks Frank M

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2008 Dec 22;102(12A):34L-40L. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.09.073.

Abstract

The Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study provides an extensive evidence base for the efficacy and tolerability of fenofibrate treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, predominantly in a primary prevention setting. The FIELD study did not show a significant effect with fenofibrate on the primary end point, coronary artery disease death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (p = 0.16). Treatment with fenofibrate did reduce all cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, the secondary end point (by 11%, p = 0.035). The primary end point was reduced by the same percentage. The modest percent reduction in the primary and secondary end points is probably a result of a number of study confounders, notably an excess of statin drop-in therapy and disproportionate treatment with other drugs for CVD prevention in the placebo arm. Estimates of relative risk reduction used by the FIELD investigators to equalize the use of statins in the fenofibrate and placebo groups suggest a true benefit of treatment on reduction of CVD events of 17%-21%. There was no excess of elevated serum liver enzymes and no cases of rhabdomyolysis in patients receiving both fenofibrate and a statin. Prevention of microvascular disease, specifically, reduction in the rate of laser treatment for retinopathy (by 30%, p = 0.0003), progression of albuminuria (p = 0.002), and nontraumatic amputations (by 38%, p = 0.011), may well be the most innovative finding of the FIELD study, especially in view of the current lack of effective preventative treatments for diabetic retinopathy and the need for additional treatments that slow the progression of diabetic nephropathy. These findings also give impetus to investigate mechanisms by which fenofibrate and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha activation may protect the endothelium of small blood vessels in patients with type 2 diabetes.

摘要

非诺贝特干预与糖尿病事件降低(FIELD)研究为非诺贝特治疗2型糖尿病患者的疗效和耐受性提供了广泛的证据基础,主要是在一级预防环境中。FIELD研究未显示非诺贝特对主要终点冠状动脉疾病死亡或非致命性心肌梗死有显著影响(p = 0.16)。非诺贝特治疗确实减少了所有心血管疾病(CVD)事件,即次要终点(降低了11%,p = 0.035)。主要终点也降低了相同的百分比。主要和次要终点的适度降低百分比可能是由于一些研究混杂因素,特别是他汀类药物意外加入治疗以及安慰剂组中用于CVD预防的其他药物治疗不均衡。FIELD研究的研究者用于平衡非诺贝特组和安慰剂组他汀类药物使用的相对风险降低估计表明,治疗对降低CVD事件的真正益处为17%-21%。接受非诺贝特和他汀类药物治疗的患者中,血清肝酶升高没有增加,也没有横纹肌溶解病例。预防微血管疾病,特别是降低视网膜病变激光治疗率(降低30%,p = 0.0003)、蛋白尿进展(p = 0.002)和非创伤性截肢(降低38%,p = 0.011),很可能是FIELD研究最具创新性的发现,特别是鉴于目前缺乏有效的糖尿病视网膜病变预防治疗方法以及需要额外的治疗来减缓糖尿病肾病的进展。这些发现也促使人们研究非诺贝特和过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体-α激活可能保护2型糖尿病患者小血管内皮的机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验