Wierzbicki A S
Department of Chemical Pathology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Apr;60(4):442-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2006.00882.x.
Endpoint studies have been performed with fibrates in coronary heart disease since 1971. The results have been confusing - starting with initial benefits in small studies, but contradicted by either minimal benefits in the Coronary Drug Project or adverse noncardiovascular (non-CV) effects in the World Health Organization Clofibrate Study. Fibrates returned for patients with low HDL-C and low LDL-C after a 25% event reduction were seen in the Veterans Affairs HDL Intervention Trial. The greater prominence ascribed to the lipid triad of the metabolic syndrome and the increasing prevalence of diabetes increased the topicality of fibrates given their main action of converting small dense to light buoyant LDL. The Fenofibrate Intervention in Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) Study has carried on the tradition. Fenofibrate therapy in 9795 patients comprising a mixed low-risk primary and a medium-risk secondary prevention cohort resulted in an 11% reduction in coronary events (p = 0.16), a similar but significant reduction in CV events (p = 0.04; number needed to treat = 70). The benefits were concentrated in primary prevention and on nonfatal myocardial events, but the study was confounded by asymmetrical statin drop-in due to the LDL-C-lowering effect of fenofibrate. Safety was generally good, including in combination with statins, but old concerns about sudden death, pancreatitis and venous thrombosis returned. Unexpected benefits were seen with fenofibrate on microvascular endpoints including microalbuminuria and retinopathy. Fenofibrate is a reasonable second-line therapy for dyslipidaemia in diabetes and safe in combination therapy. Its benefits on microvascular disease and in combination therapy require further confirmation.
自1971年以来,已针对冠心病患者开展了贝特类药物的终点研究。结果一直令人困惑——从小规模研究最初显示出益处开始,但随后被冠状动脉药物项目中极小的益处或世界卫生组织氯贝丁酯研究中的非心血管不良效应所反驳。在退伍军人事务部高密度脂蛋白干预试验中,对于高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)低且低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)低的患者,在事件减少25%后可见贝特类药物的效果。鉴于代谢综合征脂质三联征受到更多关注以及糖尿病患病率不断上升,考虑到贝特类药物将小而致密的LDL转化为轻而漂浮的LDL的主要作用,其受到的关注度有所增加。糖尿病事件降低中的非诺贝特干预(FIELD)研究延续了这一传统。对9795名患者(包括低风险的一级预防和中等风险的二级预防混合队列)进行非诺贝特治疗,使冠状动脉事件减少了11%(p = 0.16),心血管事件有类似但显著的减少(p = 0.04;需治疗人数 = 70)。益处集中在一级预防和非致死性心肌事件上,但由于非诺贝特的LDL-C降低作用,该研究受到他汀类药物非对称引入的干扰。总体安全性良好,包括与他汀类药物联合使用时,但对猝死、胰腺炎和静脉血栓形成的旧有担忧再次出现。非诺贝特在包括微量白蛋白尿和视网膜病变在内的微血管终点方面出现了意外益处。非诺贝特是糖尿病血脂异常的合理二线治疗药物,联合治疗时安全。其对微血管疾病和联合治疗的益处需要进一步证实。