Flicker Sarah, Wilson Michael, Travers Robb, Bereket Tarik, McKay Colleen, van der Meulen Anna, Guta Adrian, Cleverly Shelley, Rourke Sean B
Faculty of Environmental Sciences, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
AIDS Care. 2009 Jan;21(1):94-102. doi: 10.1080/09540120802032650.
Community-based research (CBR) approaches have become commonplace in many North American HIV communities. In many large urban centers, AIDS-service organizations (ASOs) have become active research hubs, advocating for research dollars in community settings. While ASOs have historically integrated local knowledge into their prevention, care and advocacy initiatives, many are now initiating or collaborating in research which addresses emerging issues encountered in practice with clients.
To investigate barriers and facilitating factors for ASO engagement in CBR.
We conducted a survey (n=39) and one-on-one semi-structured telephone interviews (n=25) with executive directors and CBR coordinators from ASOs in Ontario, Canada. The survey queried four major areas of interest (organizational demographics, ASO CBR activities, potential barriers and facilitators for CBR engagement, and what roles stakeholders play in CBR initiatives). The interviews focused on exploring these issues in greater depth as well as understanding barriers and facilitating factors to people living with HIV/AIDS engaging in CBR.
ASOs in Ontario are moderately supportive of CBR in their organizations. However, our survey and one-on-one interviews indicate that funding and organizational resources are both important barriers and facilitators to ASO involvement in CBR projects. Attaining access to research ethics boards and concerns that CBR results will not be acted upon also emerged as barriers to CBR, particularly once funds and organizational resources have been attained. Initiatives designed to enhance the skills of research team members emerged as an another important facilitator.
Increasing emphasis from program funders on more rigorous evaluation and accountability, coupled with pull from increasingly empowered communities demanding much more active roles in setting research agendas, means that CBR is likely here to stay. Attending to barriers and facilitators will help with enhanced ASO engagement in CBR.
基于社区的研究(CBR)方法在许多北美艾滋病社区已变得很普遍。在许多大型城市中心,艾滋病服务组织(ASO)已成为活跃的研究中心,在社区环境中争取研究资金。虽然ASO历来将当地知识融入其预防、护理和宣传倡议中,但现在许多组织正在发起或参与研究,以解决在为客户提供服务的实践中遇到的新问题。
调查ASO参与CBR的障碍和促进因素。
我们对加拿大安大略省ASO的执行董事和CBR协调员进行了一项调查(n = 39)和一对一的半结构化电话访谈(n = 25)。该调查询问了四个主要感兴趣的领域(组织人口统计学、ASO的CBR活动、CBR参与的潜在障碍和促进因素,以及利益相关者在CBR倡议中所扮演的角色)。访谈重点是更深入地探讨这些问题,以及了解艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者参与CBR的障碍和促进因素。
安大略省的ASO对其组织内的CBR持适度支持态度。然而,我们的调查和一对一访谈表明,资金和组织资源既是ASO参与CBR项目的重要障碍,也是促进因素。获得研究伦理委员会的批准以及担心CBR结果不会得到落实也成为CBR的障碍,特别是在获得资金和组织资源之后。旨在提高研究团队成员技能的举措是另一个重要的促进因素。
项目资助者越来越强调更严格的评估和问责制,再加上日益赋权的社区要求在制定研究议程中发挥更积极作用的推动,这意味着CBR可能会持续存在。关注障碍和促进因素将有助于提高ASO对CBR的参与度。