• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用椎间融合器进行单节段至多节段椎间融合术后颈椎平衡的变化

Change of cervical balance following single to multi-level interbody fusion with cage.

作者信息

Lin Hung-Lin, Cho Der-Yang, Liu Yu-Fang, Lee Wen-Yuan, Lee Han-Chung, Chen Chun-Chung

机构信息

Departments of Neurosurgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 2008 Dec;22(6):758-63. doi: 10.1080/02688690802379134.

DOI:10.1080/02688690802379134
PMID:19085359
Abstract

Postoperative limitation of cervical movement and adjacent disc degeneration are major causes of postoperative neck pain after anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion (ACDF). We present a retrospective study of dynamic radiographic change following ACDF with cages. We performed ACDF in 50 patients with cervical degenerative diseases, divided into three groups based on the level of interbody fusion (Group A: one-level; Group B: two-level; Group C: three-level). Preoperative and postoperative flexion-extension X-rays were acquired and cervical range of motion (ROM), lordosis, fusion rate, cage subsidence rate, postoperative neck pain as evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) and upper adjacent level segmental movement were evaluated. The average following time was 14.6 months. The mean change in lordotic curve was -2.31 +/- 9.53 degrees for Group A, 5.60 +/- 6.96 degrees for Group B, and 3.23 +/- 7.50 degrees for Group C (p value = 0.03). The mean change in flexion angle was -5.46 +/- 8.69 degrees for Group A, -10.2 +/- 7.38 degrees for Group B, and -13.86 +/- 10.33 degrees for Group C (p value = 0.039). The mean change in total cervical ROM was -3.85 +/- 18.74 degrees for Group A, -12.73 +/- 10.31 degrees for Group B, and -16.95 +/- 10.57 degrees for Group C (p value = 0.02). Follow-up cervical MRI for patients with persistent neck pain showed no evidence of adjacent level degeneration. There were no significant differences between the three groups with respect to postoperative change in cervical extension angle, upper adjacent level segmental movement, neck pain VAS, fusion rate or cage subsidence rate. The further decrease in total cervical ROM and flexion movement after multi-level ACDF was observed. However, a more long-term follow-up was needed to assess the actual aetiologies of upper adjacent level degeneration.

摘要

颈椎前路椎间盘切除椎间融合术(ACDF)后颈部活动受限及相邻椎间盘退变是术后颈部疼痛的主要原因。我们对采用椎间融合器的ACDF术后动态影像学变化进行了一项回顾性研究。我们对50例颈椎退行性疾病患者实施了ACDF,根据椎间融合节段分为三组(A组:单节段;B组:双节段;C组:三节段)。采集术前和术后屈伸位X线片,评估颈椎活动度(ROM)、前凸、融合率、椎间融合器下沉率、采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估的术后颈部疼痛以及上位相邻节段的节段性活动。平均随访时间为14.6个月。A组前凸曲线平均变化为-2.31±9.53度,B组为5.60±6.96度,C组为3.23±7.50度(p值=0.03)。A组屈曲角度平均变化为-5.46±8.69度,B组为-10.2±7.38度,C组为-13.86±10.33度(p值=0.039)。A组颈椎总ROM平均变化为-3.85±18.74度,B组为-12.73±10.31度,C组为-16.95±10.57度(p值=0.02)。对持续性颈部疼痛患者进行的随访颈椎MRI未显示相邻节段退变迹象。三组在术后颈椎后伸角度变化、上位相邻节段节段性活动、颈部疼痛VAS、融合率或椎间融合器下沉率方面无显著差异。观察到多节段ACDF后颈椎总ROM和屈曲活动进一步下降。然而,需要更长时间的随访来评估上位相邻节段退变的实际病因。

相似文献

1
Change of cervical balance following single to multi-level interbody fusion with cage.使用椎间融合器进行单节段至多节段椎间融合术后颈椎平衡的变化
Br J Neurosurg. 2008 Dec;22(6):758-63. doi: 10.1080/02688690802379134.
2
Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation.三级和四级颈椎前路椎间盘切除术以及带或不带钢板固定的钛笼增强融合术。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2004 Sep;1(2):160-7. doi: 10.3171/spi.2004.1.2.0160.
3
Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.颈椎间盘置换和前路融合术后的索引和相邻节段运动学:体内定量放射学分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Apr 20;36(9):721-30. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181df10fc.
4
Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.与融合术相比,Discover人工椎间盘置换术后的颈椎运动学及影像学变化。
Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.432. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
5
Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site.前瞻性随机研究颈椎关节成形术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术,长期随访:单中心 74 例患者的结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jan;18(1):36-42. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.SPINE12555. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
6
Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.使用动态颈椎植入物进行稳定化:颈椎间盘切除及减压术后的一种新型治疗方法。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Mar;22(3):237-45. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131089. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
7
Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?颈椎间盘置换术对先天性颈椎管狭窄症有益吗?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 May;26(5):577-585. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16317. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
8
Long-term Outcomes of the US FDA IDE Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing PCM Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.美国食品药品监督管理局器械临床试验豁免(IDE)前瞻性随机对照临床试验比较PCM颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的长期结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 May 15;40(10):674-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000869.
9
Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages.颈椎融合器前路融合术后颈椎动力学对相邻节段退变的影响。
Neurosurg Rev. 2009 Apr;32(2):215-24; discussion 224. doi: 10.1007/s10143-008-0164-2. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
10
Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article.一项前瞻性研究,共纳入 98 例患者,分别参与了来自单一研究中心的 3 项单独的研究性器械豁免研究,随访时间至少 2 年。临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Dec;13(6):715-21. doi: 10.3171/2010.5.SPINE09852.

引用本文的文献

1
Symptomatic pseudarthrosis requiring revision surgery after 1- or 2-level ACDF with plating: peek versus allograft.1或2节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术加钢板固定后需要翻修手术的有症状的假关节形成:聚醚醚酮与同种异体移植物对比
J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;6(4):670-680. doi: 10.21037/jss-19-419.
2
Comparison of Operating Time between Stand-alone Cage and a Standard Method for a Single Level Cervical Disc Disease.独立椎间融合器与单节段颈椎间盘疾病标准治疗方法的手术时间比较
Korean J Spine. 2012 Mar;9(1):12-7. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2012.9.1.12. Epub 2012 Mar 31.
3
Deuk Laser Disc Repair(®) is a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic cervical disc disease.
迪尤克激光椎间盘修复术(®)是一种针对有症状的颈椎间盘疾病的安全有效的治疗方法。
Surg Neurol Int. 2013 May 28;4:68. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.112610. Print 2013.