del Fresno Cañiaveras J, Campos A, Galiana M, Navarro-Martínez J A, Company R
Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2008 Nov;55(9):548-51. doi: 10.1016/s0034-9356(08)70651-0.
To evaluate the efficacy of a nerve block as an alternative technique for analgesia after knee arthroplasty and to indicate the usefulness and advantages of the anterior approach to the sciatic nerve block.
Between April 2004 and March 2006, we studied a series of consecutive patients undergoing knee arthroplasty in which a subarachnoid block was used as the anesthetic technique and postoperative analgesia was provided by means of a combined peripheral femoral nerve block and an anterior sciatic nerve block. We evaluated the mean length of time free from pain, quality of analgesia, and length of stay in hospital.
Seventy-eight patients were included in the study. The mean (SD) length of time free from pain for the group was 42.1 (3.9) hours. Patients reported mild pain after 34.8 (4.1) hours and moderate to severe pain after 42.4 (3.5) hours. By the third day, 62.8% of patients were able to bend the knee to 90 degrees. There were no complications resulting from the technique and the level of patient satisfaction was high.
A combined femoral-sciatic nerve block is effective in knee arthroplasty. It controls postoperative pain and allows for early rehabilitation. The anterior approach to the sciatic nerve is relatively simple to perform without removing the pressure bandaging from the thigh after surgery. This approach also makes it unnecessary to move the patient.
评估神经阻滞作为膝关节置换术后镇痛替代技术的疗效,并指出坐骨神经阻滞前路法的实用性和优势。
2004年4月至2006年3月期间,我们研究了一系列连续接受膝关节置换术的患者,其中蛛网膜下腔阻滞用作麻醉技术,术后镇痛通过股神经外周联合阻滞和坐骨神经阻滞前路法实现。我们评估了平均无痛时间、镇痛质量和住院时间。
78例患者纳入研究。该组平均(标准差)无痛时间为42.1(3.9)小时。患者在34.8(4.1)小时后报告轻度疼痛,在42.4(3.5)小时后报告中度至重度疼痛。到第三天,62.8%的患者能够将膝关节弯曲至90度。该技术未导致并发症,患者满意度较高。
股-坐骨神经联合阻滞在膝关节置换术中有效。它可控制术后疼痛并允许早期康复。坐骨神经阻滞前路法操作相对简单,术后无需拆除大腿的加压包扎。此方法也无需移动患者。