Am Psychol. 2008 Dec;63(9):852-62. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.852.
Although there can be no dispute that schools must do all that can be done to ensure the safety of learning environments, controversy has arisen about the use of zero tolerance policies and procedures to achieve those aims. In response to that controversy, and to assess the extent to which current practice benefits students and schools, the American Psychological Association convened a task force to evaluate the evidence and to make appropriate recommendations regarding zero tolerance policies and practices. An extensive review of the literature found that, despite a 20-year history of implementation, there are surprisingly few data that could directly test the assumptions of a zero tolerance approach to school discipline, and the data that are available tend to contradict those assumptions. Moreover, zero tolerance policies may negatively affect the relationship of education with juvenile justice and appear to conflict to some degree with current best knowledge concerning adolescent development. To address the needs of schools for discipline that can maintain school safety while maximizing student opportunity to learn, the report offers recommendations for both reforming zero tolerance where its implementation is necessary and for alternative practice to replace zero tolerance where a more appropriate approach is indicated.
尽管学校必须尽一切所能确保学习环境的安全这一点无可争议,但在使用零容忍政策和程序来实现这些目标方面却引发了争议。为回应这一争议,并评估当前做法对学生和学校的益处程度,美国心理学会召集了一个特别工作组来评估证据,并就零容忍政策和做法提出适当建议。对文献的广泛回顾发现,尽管零容忍政策已经实施了20年,但令人惊讶的是,几乎没有数据能够直接检验零容忍学校纪律方法的假设,而且现有的数据往往与这些假设相矛盾。此外,零容忍政策可能会对教育与青少年司法的关系产生负面影响,并且在某种程度上似乎与当前关于青少年发展的最佳知识相冲突。为满足学校对既能维护学校安全又能最大限度增加学生学习机会的纪律的需求,该报告针对在必要时改革零容忍政策以及在表明采用更合适方法的情况下用替代做法取代零容忍政策都提出了建议。