Cattamanchi Adithya, Dantes Raymund B, Metcalfe John Z, Jarlsberg Leah G, Grinsdale Jennifer, Kawamura L Masae, Osmond Dennis, Hopewell Philip C, Nahid Payam
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco GeneralHospital, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jan 15;48(2):179-85. doi: 10.1086/595689.
Risk factors and treatment outcomes under program conditions for isoniazid (INH)-monoresistant tuberculosis have not been well described.
Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed for all cases of culture-confirmed, INH-monoresistant tuberculosis ( n = 137) reported to the San Francisco Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Control Section from October 1992 through October 2005, and those cases were compared with a time-matched sample of drug-susceptible tuberculosis cases (n = 274)
In multivariate analysis, only a history of treatment for latent tuberculosis (odds ratio [OR], 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-6.4; P = .003) or for active tuberculosis (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4-5.0; P = .002) were significantly associated with INH-monoresistant tuberculosis. Of the 119 patients who completed treatment, 49 (41%) completed a 6-month treatment regimen. Treatment was extended to 7-12 months for 53 (45%) of the patients and to >12 months for 17 (14%). Treatment was most commonly extended because pyrazinamide was not given for the recommended 6-month duration (35 patients [29%]). Despite variation in treatment regimens, the combined end point of treatment failure or relapse was uncommon among patients with INH-monoresistant tuberculosis and was not significantly different for patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis (1.7% vs. 2.2%; P = .73).
A history of treatment for latent or active tuberculosis was associated with subsequent INH monoresistance. Treatment outcomes for patients with INH-monoresistant tuberculosis were excellent and were no different from those for patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis. However, new, short-course regimens are needed because a small proportion of patients completed the 6-month treatment regimen recommended by the American Thoracic Society, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Infectious Diseases Society of America, primarily because of pyrazinamide intolerance.
在项目条件下,异烟肼(INH)单耐药结核病的危险因素和治疗结果尚未得到充分描述。
回顾性分析了1992年10月至2005年10月期间向旧金山公共卫生部结核病控制科报告的所有培养确诊的INH单耐药结核病病例(n = 137)的病历,并将这些病例与时间匹配的药物敏感结核病病例样本(n = 274)进行比较。
在多变量分析中,只有潜伏性结核病治疗史(比值比[OR],3.1;95%置信区间[CI],1.5 - 6.4;P = 0.003)或活动性结核病治疗史(OR,2.7;95% CI,1.4 - 5.0;P = 0.002)与INH单耐药结核病显著相关。在119例完成治疗的患者中,49例(41%)完成了6个月的治疗方案。53例(45%)患者的治疗延长至7 - 12个月,17例(14%)患者的治疗延长至>12个月。治疗最常延长是因为吡嗪酰胺未按推荐的6个月疗程使用(35例患者[29%])。尽管治疗方案存在差异,但INH单耐药结核病患者中治疗失败或复发的综合终点并不常见,与药物敏感结核病患者相比无显著差异(1.7%对2.2%;P = 0.73)。
潜伏性或活动性结核病治疗史与随后的INH单耐药相关。INH单耐药结核病患者的治疗结果良好,与药物敏感结核病患者无异。然而,由于一小部分患者主要因吡嗪酰胺不耐受而未完成美国胸科学会、疾病控制与预防中心和美国传染病学会推荐的6个月治疗方案,因此需要新的短程治疗方案。