Magkos Faidon, Arvaniti Fotini, Zampelas Antonis
Laboratory of Nutrition and Clinical Dietetics, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, 70 El. Venizelou Avenue, 17671 Athens, Greece.
Nutr Res Rev. 2003 Dec;16(2):211-22. doi: 10.1079/NRR200361.
The demand for organic foods is constantly increasing mainly due to consumers' perception that they are healthier and safer than conventional foods. There is a need for information related to food safety to inform consumers of the health benefits and/or hazards of food products of both origins, in order to optimise the impact on health and minimise the risks. Several gaps and limitations in scientific knowledge with regard to food risk evaluation make it difficult to draw generalised conclusions. Still, some organic foods can be expected to contain fewer agrochemical residues and lower levels of nitrate than conventionally grown alternatives. On the other hand, environmental contaminants are equally present in foods of both origins. With regard to other food hazards, such as natural chemicals, microbial pathogens and mycotoxins, no clear conclusions can be drawn, although several interesting points can be highlighted. It is difficult, therefore, to weigh the risks, but what should be made clear to consumers is that 'organic' does not equal 'safe'. If producers adopt proper agricultural practices and consumers maintain hygienic conditions, risks associated with food contaminants can be minimised, regardless of the food's organic or conventional origin.
对有机食品的需求在不断增加,主要是因为消费者认为有机食品比传统食品更健康、更安全。需要有关食品安全的信息,以便向消费者告知这两种来源的食品的健康益处和/或危害,从而优化对健康的影响并将风险降至最低。关于食品风险评估的科学知识存在一些差距和局限性,这使得难以得出普遍适用的结论。尽管如此,预计一些有机食品含有的农用化学品残留和硝酸盐水平会低于传统种植的同类食品。另一方面,环境污染物在这两种来源的食品中都同样存在。关于其他食品危害,如天然化学物质、微生物病原体和霉菌毒素,虽然可以突出几个有趣的要点,但无法得出明确结论。因此,很难权衡风险,但应该向消费者明确的是,“有机”并不等同于“安全”。如果生产者采用适当的农业做法,消费者保持卫生条件,那么与食品污染物相关的风险就可以降至最低,无论食品是有机来源还是传统来源。