Suppr超能文献

脱敏生物活性剂可提高间接树脂粘结修复体的粘结强度:初步结果。

Desensitizing bioactive agents improves bond strength of indirect resin-cemented restorations: preliminary results.

作者信息

Pires-de-Souza Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri, de Marco Fabíola Fiorezi, Casemiro Luciana Assirati, Panzeri Heitor

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Apr;15(2):120-6. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000200009.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the bond strength of indirect composite restorations cemented with a resin-based cement associated with etch-and-rinse and self-etching primer adhesive systems to dentin treated or not with a bioactive material.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Twenty bovine incisor crowns had the buccal enamel removed and the dentin ground flat. The teeth were assigned to 4 groups (n=5): Group I: acid etching + Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply); Group II: application of a bioactive glass (Biosilicato) + acid etching + Prime & Bond NT; Group III: One-up Bond F (J Morita); Group IV: Biosilicato + One-up Bond F. Indirect composite resin (Artglass, Kulzer) cylinders (6 x 10 mm) were fabricated and cemented to the teeth with a dual-cure resin-based cement (Enforce, Dentsply). After cementation, the specimens were stored in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C for 30 days and thereafter tested in tensile strength in a universal testing machine (EMIC) with 50 kgf load cell at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Failure modes were assessed under scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test (95% level of confidence).

RESULTS

Groups I, II and III had statistically similar results (p>0.05). Group IV had statistically significant higher bond strength means (p<0.05) than the other groups. The analysis of the debonded surfaces showed a predominance of adhesive failure mode for Group III and mixed failure mode for the other groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of desensitizing agent did not affect negatively the bonding of the indirect composite restorations to dentin, independently of the tested adhesive systems.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估用树脂基水门汀粘结的间接复合树脂修复体与酸蚀冲洗和自酸蚀底漆粘结系统在使用或未使用生物活性材料处理的牙本质上的粘结强度。

材料与方法

20颗牛切牙冠去除颊面釉质,将牙本质磨平。将牙齿分为4组(n = 5):第一组:酸蚀 + Prime & Bond NT(登士柏);第二组:应用生物活性玻璃(Biosilicato)+ 酸蚀 + Prime & Bond NT;第三组:One-up Bond F(日本森田);第四组:Biosilicato + One-up Bond F。制作间接复合树脂(Artglass,库尔泽)圆柱体(6×10毫米),并用双固化树脂基水门汀(Enforce,登士柏)粘结到牙齿上。粘结后,将标本在37℃的人工唾液中储存30天,然后在万能试验机(EMIC)上以1毫米/分钟的十字头速度用50千克力的测力传感器测试拉伸强度。在扫描电子显微镜下评估失败模式。数据通过方差分析和Tukey检验进行统计学分析(置信水平为95%)。

结果

第一组、第二组和第三组的结果在统计学上相似(p>0.05)。第四组的粘结强度均值在统计学上显著高于其他组(p<0.05)。对脱粘表面的分析表明,第三组主要为粘结失败模式,其他组为混合失败模式。

结论

脱敏剂的使用对间接复合树脂修复体与牙本质的粘结没有负面影响,与所测试的粘结系统无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30b6/4327242/56e12f7075af/1678-7757-jaos-15-02-0120-gf01.jpg

相似文献

1
4
Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of etch-and-rinse and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin.
J Prosthodont. 2012 Feb;21(2):101-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00794.x. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
7
Effect of two abrasive systems on resin bonding to laboratory-processed indirect resin composite restorations.
J Esthet Dent. 1999;11(4):185-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00398.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of the use of bromelain associated with bioactive glass-ceramic on dentin/adhesive interface.
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jan 20;28(1):106. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05496-7.
2
The effect of Phytosphingosine and bioactive glass-ceramics in preventing dental enamel erosion.
Braz Dent J. 2023 Mar-Apr;34(2):88-96. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202304904.
3
Effect of Incorporation of Bioactive Glass-Ceramic into Self-etch Adhesives.
J Adhes Dent. 2022 Apr 13;24:195-202. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b2916451.
4
Influences of desensitizing agents on bond strength of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive system to dentin.
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Sep-Oct;23(5):522-527. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_58_20. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
5
Effect of Methods of Biosilicate Microparticle Application on Dentin Adhesion.
Dent J (Basel). 2019 Apr 1;7(2):35. doi: 10.3390/dj7020035.
6
Bioactive glass ceramic can improve the bond strength of sealant/enamel?
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019 Aug;20(4):325-331. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0409-x. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
7
Clinical, double blind, randomized controlled trial of experimental adhesive protocols in caries-affected dentin.
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1855-1864. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2615-7. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
9
Assessment of antimicrobial effect of Biosilicate® against anaerobic, microaerophilic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms.
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011 Jun;22(6):1439-46. doi: 10.1007/s10856-011-4330-7. Epub 2011 May 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of Gluma Desensitizer on dentin hypersensitivity in periodontally treated patients.
Braz Oral Res. 2006 Jul-Sep;20(3):252-6. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242006000300013.
4
Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins.
Dent Mater. 2006 Oct;22(10):973-80. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.020. Epub 2006 Jan 6.
5
Hydrolytic stability of self-etching adhesive systems.
J Adhes Dent. 2005 Summer;7(2):107-16.
6
Incompatibility of oxalate desensitizers with acidic, fluoride-containing total-etch adhesives.
J Dent Res. 2005 Aug;84(8):730-5. doi: 10.1177/154405910508400809.
7
Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching.
J Dent. 2006 Jan;34(1):77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.04.001. Epub 2005 Jun 23.
8
A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results.
J Dent Res. 2005 Feb;84(2):118-32. doi: 10.1177/154405910508400204.
10
The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement.
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 May;91(5):428-35. doi: 10.1016/S0022391304000770.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验