Pires-de-Souza Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri, de Marco Fabíola Fiorezi, Casemiro Luciana Assirati, Panzeri Heitor
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Apr;15(2):120-6. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000200009.
The aim of this study was to assess the bond strength of indirect composite restorations cemented with a resin-based cement associated with etch-and-rinse and self-etching primer adhesive systems to dentin treated or not with a bioactive material.
Twenty bovine incisor crowns had the buccal enamel removed and the dentin ground flat. The teeth were assigned to 4 groups (n=5): Group I: acid etching + Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply); Group II: application of a bioactive glass (Biosilicato) + acid etching + Prime & Bond NT; Group III: One-up Bond F (J Morita); Group IV: Biosilicato + One-up Bond F. Indirect composite resin (Artglass, Kulzer) cylinders (6 x 10 mm) were fabricated and cemented to the teeth with a dual-cure resin-based cement (Enforce, Dentsply). After cementation, the specimens were stored in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C for 30 days and thereafter tested in tensile strength in a universal testing machine (EMIC) with 50 kgf load cell at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Failure modes were assessed under scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test (95% level of confidence).
Groups I, II and III had statistically similar results (p>0.05). Group IV had statistically significant higher bond strength means (p<0.05) than the other groups. The analysis of the debonded surfaces showed a predominance of adhesive failure mode for Group III and mixed failure mode for the other groups.
The use of desensitizing agent did not affect negatively the bonding of the indirect composite restorations to dentin, independently of the tested adhesive systems.
本研究旨在评估用树脂基水门汀粘结的间接复合树脂修复体与酸蚀冲洗和自酸蚀底漆粘结系统在使用或未使用生物活性材料处理的牙本质上的粘结强度。
20颗牛切牙冠去除颊面釉质,将牙本质磨平。将牙齿分为4组(n = 5):第一组:酸蚀 + Prime & Bond NT(登士柏);第二组:应用生物活性玻璃(Biosilicato)+ 酸蚀 + Prime & Bond NT;第三组:One-up Bond F(日本森田);第四组:Biosilicato + One-up Bond F。制作间接复合树脂(Artglass,库尔泽)圆柱体(6×10毫米),并用双固化树脂基水门汀(Enforce,登士柏)粘结到牙齿上。粘结后,将标本在37℃的人工唾液中储存30天,然后在万能试验机(EMIC)上以1毫米/分钟的十字头速度用50千克力的测力传感器测试拉伸强度。在扫描电子显微镜下评估失败模式。数据通过方差分析和Tukey检验进行统计学分析(置信水平为95%)。
第一组、第二组和第三组的结果在统计学上相似(p>0.05)。第四组的粘结强度均值在统计学上显著高于其他组(p<0.05)。对脱粘表面的分析表明,第三组主要为粘结失败模式,其他组为混合失败模式。
脱敏剂的使用对间接复合树脂修复体与牙本质的粘结没有负面影响,与所测试的粘结系统无关。