Gomes Maximiliano Schünke, Barletta Fernando Branco, Della Bona Alvaro, Vanni José Roberto, Pereira Charles da Cunha, de Figueiredo José Antônio Poli
Medical and Dental Center of the Health Department at Brigada Military, RS, Brazil.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Oct;15(5):429-36. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000500011.
Coronal leakage is an important factor affecting the outcome of endodontic therapy. This study evaluated the microbial leakage (ML) and the apical inflammatory response (AIR) in dog's teeth after root canal filling with three endodontic sealers, post preparation and exposure to the oral environment, testing the hypothesis that there is a positive correlation between these two histological parameters (ML and AIR). Sixty-four root canals of 8 mongrel dogs were cleaned, shaped and randomly distributed into groups according to the sealer to be used: Sealer 26 (n=18); AH Plus (n=18); RoekoSeal (n=19); no sealer - control group (n=9). Root canals were filled by the lateral condensation technique. Post space preparation left 4 mm of filling material in the apical root third, and specimens were exposed to the oral environment for 90 days. The dogs were killed and jaw blocks were histologically processed using Brown & Brenn and HE staining techniques. ML and AIR were scored from 1 to 4. Results were analyzed statistically using ANOVA, Duncan's post-hoc test and Spearman's correlation. ML and AIR score means were: Sealer 26 - 2.44+/-0.98 and 2.50+/-0.70; AH Plus - 2.50+/-0.78 and 2.22+/-0.54; RoekoSeal - 1.84+/-0.95 and 2.63+/-0.83; Control - 2.56+/-1.23 and 3.11+/-0.60. Statistically significant differences in AIR scores were found between the AH Plus and control groups (p<0.05). Although RoekoSeal had the lowest ML means, and AH Plus, the lowest AIR means after 90-day exposure to the oral environment, no statistically significant differences were found between the three sealers under study, and no correlation was found between ML and AIR.
冠部微渗漏是影响牙髓治疗效果的一个重要因素。本研究评估了用三种根管封闭剂进行根管充填、桩道预备并暴露于口腔环境后犬牙的微生物渗漏(ML)和根尖炎症反应(AIR),检验这两个组织学参数(ML和AIR)之间存在正相关的假设。将8只杂种犬的64个根管进行清理、预备,然后根据所用封闭剂随机分组:Sealer 26组(n = 18);AH Plus组(n = 18);RoekoSeal组(n = 19);无封闭剂对照组(n = 9)。采用侧向加压技术进行根管充填。桩道预备后在根尖三分之一处保留4 mm的充填材料,标本暴露于口腔环境90天。处死犬只,用Brown & Brenn和苏木精-伊红(HE)染色技术对颌骨块进行组织学处理。ML和AIR的评分从1到4。结果采用方差分析、Duncan事后检验和Spearman相关性分析进行统计学分析。ML和AIR评分均值分别为:Sealer 26组 - 2.44±0.98和2.50±0.70;AH Plus组 - 2.50±0.78和2.22±0.54;RoekoSeal组 - 1.84±0.95和2.63±0.83;对照组 - 2.56±1.23和3.11±0.60。在AH Plus组和对照组之间发现AIR评分有统计学显著差异(p < 0.05)。尽管RoekoSeal组的ML均值最低,AH Plus组在暴露于口腔环境90天后的AIR均值最低,但在所研究的三种封闭剂之间未发现统计学显著差异,且ML和AIR之间未发现相关性。