• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心肌梗死患者使用药物洗脱支架行无保护左主干冠状动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多中心国际注册研究

Multicenter international registry of unprotected left main coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in patients with myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Lee Michael S, Sillano Dario, Latib Azeem, Chieffo Alaide, Zoccai Giuseppe Biondi, Bhatia Ravi, Sheiban Imad, Colombo Antonio, Tobis Jonathan

机构信息

Department of Medicine/Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90095-171715, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan 1;73(1):15-21. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21712.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.21712
PMID:19089930
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients who present with myocardial infarction (MI) and unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease represent an extremely high-risk subset of patients. ULMCA percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) in MI patients has not been extensively studied.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter international registry, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of 62 consecutive patients with MI who underwent ULMCA PCI with DES (23 ST-elevation MI [STEMI] and 39 non-ST-elevation MI [NSTEMI]) from 2002 to 2006.

RESULTS

The mean age was 70 +/- 12 years. Cardiogenic shock was present in 24%. The mean EuroSCORE was 10 +/- 8. Angiographic success was achieved in all patients. Overall in-hospital major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was 10%, mortality was 8%, all due to cardiac deaths from cardiogenic shock, and one patient suffered a periprocedural MI. At 586 +/- 431 days, 18 patients (29%) experienced MACE, 12 patients (19%) died (the mortality rate was 47% in patients with cardiogenic shock), and target vessel revascularization was performed in four patients, all of whom had distal bifurcation involvement (two patients underwent repeat PCI and two patients underwent bypass surgery). There was no additional MI. Two patients had probable stent thrombosis and one had possible stent thrombosis. Diabetes [hazard ratio (HR) 4.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.07-17.36), P = 0.04), left ventricular ejection fraction [HR 0.94, 95% CI (0.90-0.98), P = 0.005), and intubation [HR 7.00, 95% CI (1.62-30.21), P = 0.009) were significantly associated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MI and ULMCA disease represent a very high-risk subgroup of patients who are critically ill. PCI with DES appears to be technically feasible, associated with acceptable long-term outcomes, and a reasonable alternative to surgical revascularization for MI patients with ULMCA disease. Randomized trials are needed to determine the ideal revascularization strategy for these patients.

摘要

背景

出现心肌梗死(MI)和无保护左主干冠状动脉(ULMCA)疾病的患者是极高风险的患者亚组。MI患者使用药物洗脱支架(DES)进行ULMCA经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)尚未得到广泛研究。

方法

在这项回顾性多中心国际注册研究中,我们评估了2002年至2006年连续62例接受DES进行ULMCA PCI的MI患者的临床结局(23例ST段抬高型心肌梗死[STEMI]和39例非ST段抬高型心肌梗死[NSTEMI])。

结果

平均年龄为70±12岁。24%的患者出现心源性休克。平均欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)评分为10±8。所有患者均实现血管造影成功。总体院内主要不良心脏事件(MACE)发生率为10%,死亡率为8%,均因心源性休克导致的心脏死亡,1例患者发生围手术期心肌梗死。在586±431天时,18例患者(29%)发生MACE,12例患者(19%)死亡(心源性休克患者的死亡率为47%),4例患者进行了靶血管血运重建,所有这些患者均有远端分叉病变(2例患者接受了重复PCI,2例患者接受了搭桥手术)。无额外的心肌梗死发生。2例患者可能发生支架血栓形成,1例患者可能发生支架血栓形成。糖尿病[风险比(HR)4.22,95%置信区间(CI)(1.07 - 17.36),P = 0.04]、左心室射血分数[HR 0.94,95%CI(0.90 - 0.98),P = 0.005]和插管[HR 7.00,95%CI(1.62 - 30.21),P = 0.009]与死亡率增加显著相关。

结论

MI和ULMCA疾病患者是病情危重的极高风险亚组患者。DES PCI在技术上似乎可行,具有可接受的长期结局,是ULMCA疾病MI患者手术血运重建的合理替代方案。需要进行随机试验以确定这些患者的理想血运重建策略。

相似文献

1
Multicenter international registry of unprotected left main coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in patients with myocardial infarction.心肌梗死患者使用药物洗脱支架行无保护左主干冠状动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多中心国际注册研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan 1;73(1):15-21. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21712.
2
Long-term outcomes of elective drug-eluting stenting of the unprotected left main coronary artery in patients with normal left ventricular function.左主干冠状动脉正常的左心室功能患者行择期药物洗脱支架置入术的长期结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun 1;77(7):945-51. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22777. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
3
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
4
Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架置入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病后,冠状动脉解剖结构和支架技术对长期预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
5
Comparison of 5-year outcomes in patients with and without unprotected left main coronary artery disease after treatment with sirolimus-eluting stents: insights from the j-Cypher registry.比较接受西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗后伴有和不伴有无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的 5 年结局:来自 j-Cypher 注册研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul;6(7):654-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.015.
6
Long-term clinical results following stenting of the left main stem: insights from RESEARCH (Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) and T-SEARCH (Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) Registries.左主干支架置入术后的长期临床结果:来自 RESEARCH(雷帕霉素洗脱支架在鹿特丹心脏病学医院评估)和 T-SEARCH(紫杉醇支架在鹿特丹心脏病学医院评估)注册研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jun;3(6):584-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.017.
7
Impact of sex on 3-year outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention using bare-metal and drug-eluting stents in previously untreated coronary artery disease: insights from the RESEARCH (Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) and T-SEARCH (Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) Registries.性别对既往未经治疗的冠状动脉疾病患者使用裸金属支架和药物洗脱支架进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后3年预后的影响:来自RESEARCH(鹿特丹心脏病医院雷帕霉素洗脱支架评估)和T-SEARCH(鹿特丹心脏病医院紫杉醇支架评估)注册研究的见解
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jul;2(7):603-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.03.016.
8
Long-term outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stents vs. paclitaxel-eluting stents in unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions.无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变中,西罗莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架的长期疗效对比。
Clin Cardiol. 2011 Jun;34(6):378-83. doi: 10.1002/clc.20887. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
9
Long-term follow-up of percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main lesions with drug eluting stents: predictors of clinical outcome.药物洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期随访:临床结局的预测因素
EuroIntervention. 2009 Jan;4(4):457-63. doi: 10.4244/eijv4i4a79.
10
Prediction of 1-year clinical outcomes using the SYNTAX score in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a substudy of the STRATEGY (Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Abciximab and Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and MULTISTRATEGY (Multicenter Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban Versus Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study) trials.应用 SYNTAX 评分预测行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者 1 年临床结局:STRATEGY(单次大剂量替罗非班和西罗莫司洗脱支架与阿昔单抗和裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死)和 MULTISTRATEGY(多中心评价单次大剂量替罗非班与阿昔单抗联合西罗莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架治疗急性心肌梗死研究)试验的一项亚研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan;4(1):66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.017.

引用本文的文献

1
A study of unprotected left main intervention in the ACS population 2013-2018.2013 年至 2018 年 ACS 人群中未经保护的左主干介入治疗的研究。
Indian Heart J. 2021 Jul-Aug;73(4):492-496. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
2
Optimal strategy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction due to unprotected left main coronary artery occlusion (OPTIMAL): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.无保护左主干冠状动脉闭塞所致急性心肌梗死的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗优化策略(OPTIMAL):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Mar 8;20(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3211-0.
3
Thirty Years Later: Evolution of Treatment for Acute Left Main Coronary Artery Occlusion.
三十年后:急性左主干冠状动脉闭塞治疗的演变
Case Rep Cardiol. 2016;2016:7360682. doi: 10.1155/2016/7360682. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
4
Long-term prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction due to unprotected left main coronary artery disease: a single-centre experience over 14 years.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病所致急性心肌梗死患者的长期预后:一项14年的单中心经验
Singapore Med J. 2016 Jul;57(7):396-400. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016121.
5
Acute myocardial infarction due to left main coronary artery disease in men and women: does ST-segment elevation matter?男性和女性左主干冠状动脉疾病所致急性心肌梗死:ST段抬高是否重要?
Arch Med Sci. 2015 Dec 10;11(6):1197-204. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.56345. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
6
Therapeutic effect of interventional therapy for unprotected left main coronary artery lesions in aged patients.老年患者无保护左主干冠状动脉病变的介入治疗效果
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2015 Nov;12(6):634-40. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.06.005.
7
Treatment strategies in the left main coronary artery disease associated with acute coronary syndromes.与急性冠状动脉综合征相关的左主干冠状动脉疾病的治疗策略。
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2015 Oct;27(4):272-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
8
Recent Advances in the Treatment of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死治疗的最新进展
Scientifica (Cairo). 2012;2012:683683. doi: 10.6064/2012/683683. Epub 2012 Sep 16.
9
Drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis a meta-analysis.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jun;3(6):602-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.019.