• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期随访:临床结局的预测因素

Long-term follow-up of percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main lesions with drug eluting stents: predictors of clinical outcome.

作者信息

Pavei Andrea, Oreglia Jacopo A, Martin Guillaume, Tousek Petr, Sharif Faisal, Farah Bruno, Sauguet Antoine, Fajadet Jean

机构信息

Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2009 Jan;4(4):457-63. doi: 10.4244/eijv4i4a79.

DOI:10.4244/eijv4i4a79
PMID:19284067
Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the long-term follow-up of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and forty-eight patients (mean age 71 +/- 10 years) with ULMCA stenoses underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES. Mean ejection fraction (EF) was 63 +/- 13% and distal ULMCA was involved in 63.5% of cases. In-hospital outcome showed one intra-procedural death, no stent thrombosis and 2% non Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI). Clinical follow-up was available in all patients (874 +/- 382 days): 10.1% of them had died, 8.8% had target lesion revascularisation (TLR) and 4.1% experienced MI. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred in 20.3%. Mortality predictors were EF < or = 55% (OR 3.6, 95%-C.I. 1.3-10.1, p = 0.016) and EuroSCORE > or = 6 (OR 3.9, 95%-CI 1.1-14.1, p = 0.037). TLR predictors were distal lesion (OR 8.5, 95%-CI 1.1-15, p = 0.041) and age < 64 years (OR 3.1, 95%-CI 1-9, p = 0.042). MACE predictor was EF < or = 55% (OR 2.4, 95%-CI 1.1-5.2, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

ULMCA stenting with DES is safe, with favourable in-hospital outcome. Long-term results are acceptable with a mortality rate of 10%, a TLR rate of 9%, and a MACE rate of 20%. Low EF and high EuroSCORE predict mortality, while younger age and distal lesions predict TLR. Low EF also predicts MACE.

摘要

目的

评估药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉(ULMCA)的长期随访结果。

方法与结果

148例(平均年龄71±10岁)ULMCA狭窄患者接受了DES经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。平均射血分数(EF)为63±13%,63.5%的病例累及ULMCA远端。住院期间结果显示1例术中死亡,无支架血栓形成,2%发生非Q波心肌梗死(MI)。所有患者均获得临床随访(874±382天):10.1%的患者死亡,8.8%发生靶病变血管重建(TLR),4.1%发生MI。主要不良心脏事件(MACE)发生率为20.3%。死亡率的预测因素为EF≤55%(比值比3.6,95%可信区间1.3 - 10.1,p = 0.016)和欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)≥6(比值比3.9,95%可信区间1.1 - 14.1,p = 0.037)。TLR的预测因素为远端病变(比值比8.5,95%可信区间1.1 - 15,p = 0.041)和年龄<64岁(比值比3.1,95%可信区间1 - 9,p = 0.042)。MACE的预测因素为EF≤55%(比值比2.4,95%可信区间1.1 - 5.2,p = 0.027)。

结论

DES置入治疗ULMCA是安全的,住院期间结果良好。长期结果可以接受,死亡率为10%,TLR率为9%,MACE率为20%。低EF和高EuroSCORE预测死亡率,而年轻和远端病变预测TLR。低EF也预测MACE。

相似文献

1
Long-term follow-up of percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main lesions with drug eluting stents: predictors of clinical outcome.药物洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期随访:临床结局的预测因素
EuroIntervention. 2009 Jan;4(4):457-63. doi: 10.4244/eijv4i4a79.
2
Multicenter international registry of unprotected left main coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in patients with myocardial infarction.心肌梗死患者使用药物洗脱支架行无保护左主干冠状动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多中心国际注册研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan 1;73(1):15-21. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21712.
3
Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架置入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病后,冠状动脉解剖结构和支架技术对长期预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
4
Long-term clinical results following stenting of the left main stem: insights from RESEARCH (Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) and T-SEARCH (Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) Registries.左主干支架置入术后的长期临床结果:来自 RESEARCH(雷帕霉素洗脱支架在鹿特丹心脏病学医院评估)和 T-SEARCH(紫杉醇支架在鹿特丹心脏病学医院评估)注册研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jun;3(6):584-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.017.
5
Impact of lesion length and vessel size on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents pooled analysis from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice) Randomized Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后病变长度和血管大小对临床结局的影响:来自 SPIRIT(依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统 XIENCE V 的临床评估)和 COMPARE(真实世界中第二代依维莫司洗脱和紫杉醇洗脱支架)随机试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Nov;4(11):1209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.016.
6
Early and long-term results of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis with paclitaxel-eluting stents: the FRIEND (French multicentre RegIstry for stenting of uNprotecteD LMCA stenosis) registry.紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄的早期和长期结果:FRIEND(法国多中心无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄支架置入注册研究)。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Oct 30;7(6):680-8. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I6A110.
7
Unprotected left main stenting with a second-generation drug-eluting stent: one-year outcomes of the LEMAX Pilot study.无保护左主干支架置入术联合第二代药物洗脱支架:LEMAX Pilot 研究一年随访结果。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Oct 30;7(6):689-96. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I6A111.
8
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
9
Long-term clinical outcome of rotational atherectomy followed by drug-eluting stent implantation in complex calcified coronary lesions.旋磨术联合药物洗脱支架置入术治疗复杂钙化病变的长期临床疗效。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;81(2):285-91. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24367. Epub 2012 May 2.
10
Twelve month clinical and angiographic outcome after stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis with paclitaxel-eluting stents--results of the multicentre FRIEND registry.使用紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄12个月后的临床和血管造影结果——多中心FRIEND注册研究结果
EuroIntervention. 2009 Jan;4(4):449-56. doi: 10.4244/eijv4i4a78.

引用本文的文献

1
OCT for Optimizing Long-Term Clinical Results in Left Main PCI-Dream or Reality? Results from a Single-Center High-Volume Registry.光学相干断层扫描用于优化左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期临床结果——梦想还是现实?来自单中心高容量注册研究的结果
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 18;14(16):5824. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165824.
2
Technological Advances Are Associated With Better Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Disease.技术进步与无保护左主干病变患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床结局改善相关。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e033929. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033929. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
3
Study of Short and Intermediate Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Protected and Unprotected LMCA Stenting.
左主干冠状动脉支架置入术(有保护与无保护)患者的短期和中期临床结果研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):OC29-OC33. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/21821.9716. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
4
Stenting of left main coronary artery stenosis: A to Z.左主干冠状动脉狭窄的支架置入术:从A到Z
Heart Asia. 2013 Jan 25;5(1):18-27. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2012-010218. eCollection 2013.
5
Stenting versus surgery for significant left main disease.严重左主干病变的支架置入术与外科手术对比
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015;17(4):18. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0574-z.
6
The impact of severe distal left main disease on target lesion revascularization in patients with trifurcating coronary artery disease receiving the paclitaxel drug-eluting stent.严重左主干远端病变对接受紫杉醇药物洗脱支架治疗的冠状动脉三支病变患者靶病变血运重建的影响。
Int J Angiol. 2010 Fall;19(3):e106-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1278378.