Suppr超能文献

翻译中迷失?使用计算机化病例 vignettes 评估住院患者抗菌药物使用合理性的可靠性。

Lost in translation? Reliability of assessing inpatient antimicrobial appropriateness with use of computerized case vignettes.

作者信息

Schwartz David N, Wu Ulysses S, Lyles Rosie D, Xiang Yingxu, Kieszkowski Piotr, Hota Bala, Weinstein Robert A

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Stroger Hospital of Cook County, 1901 W. Harrison St., Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;30(2):163-71. doi: 10.1086/593970.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe and measure reliability of a computer-assisted method of case vignette assembly and expert review to assess the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy for hospitalized adults.

DESIGN

Feasibility and reliability analysis of computer-assisted tool used to compare the effects of antimicrobial stewardship interventions.

SETTING

Public teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Randomly selected adult antimicrobial recipients admitted to inpatient medicine services.

METHODS

Clinical data abstracted from 504 paper medical records were merged with computerized laboratory and pharmacy data to assemble case vignettes that underwent expert review for appropriateness. We performed 3 validations, as follows: data for 35 vignettes abstracted independently by 2 research assistants were assessed for interrater agreement, expert review of 24 vignettes was compared with review of the corresponding paper medical records, and interrater reliability of antimicrobial appropriateness assessments by 2 experts was determined for 70 case vignettes.

RESULTS

Vignette assembly and expert review each required 10-12 minutes per case. Potentially important discrepancies occurred in 0%-32% of clinical findings abstracted independently by 2 research assistants. Expert review of 24 vignettes and the corresponding full paper medical records yielded fair agreement (kappa, 0.30). The 2 experts identified inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy in 67% and 61% of case vignettes reviewed independently; interrater agreement was improved after sequential case discussion and stringent application of appropriateness criteria (kappa, 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

Our case vignette assembly and expert review method is efficient, but improvements in both technical and human performance are needed to be able to yield valid estimates of the prevalence of inappropriate antimicrobial use. Assessments of antimicrobial appropriateness require validation.

摘要

目的

描述并衡量一种计算机辅助的病例 vignette 组装及专家评审方法的可靠性,以评估住院成人抗菌治疗的适宜性。

设计

用于比较抗菌管理干预效果的计算机辅助工具的可行性和可靠性分析。

地点

公立教学医院。

患者

随机选取入住内科病房的成年抗菌药物使用者。

方法

从 504 份纸质病历中提取的临床数据与计算机化的实验室和药房数据合并,以组装病例 vignette,并由专家对其适宜性进行评审。我们进行了 3 次验证,具体如下:评估 2 名研究助理独立提取的 35 个 vignette 的数据,以确定评分者间的一致性;将 24 个 vignette 的专家评审结果与相应纸质病历的评审结果进行比较;确定 2 名专家对 70 个病例 vignette 的抗菌适宜性评估的评分者间可靠性。

结果

每个病例的 vignette 组装和专家评审各需 10 - 12 分钟。2 名研究助理独立提取的临床发现中,0% - 32%存在潜在的重要差异。对 24 个 vignette 的专家评审与相应的完整纸质病历评审结果一致性一般(kappa 值为 0.30)。2 名专家在独立评审的病例 vignette 中,分别有 67%和 61%发现初始抗菌治疗不恰当;在依次进行病例讨论并严格应用适宜性标准后,评分者间一致性得到改善(kappa 值为 0.72)。

结论

我们的病例 vignette 组装及专家评审方法效率较高,但在技术和人员操作方面均需改进,以便能够有效估计不恰当抗菌药物使用的发生率。抗菌适宜性评估需要进行验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验